Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLAL vs RECS
HLAL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts HLAL vs RECS
HLAL vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLAL vs. RECS commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLAL is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.84B vs. HLAL (914M). HLAL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: HLAL (12.863) vs RECS (7.150). HLAL was incepted earlier than RECS: HLAL (7 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than HLAL (0.50). RECS has a higher turnover HLAL (10.00) vs HLAL (10.00).
| HLAL | RECS | HLAL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.863 | 7.150 | 180% |
| Net Assets | 914M | 5.84B | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.15 | 333% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 32.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 0.46 | 0.74 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HLAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 18 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HLAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLAL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLAL | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| LRCX - HLAL | 70% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| INTU - HLAL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| TSLA - HLAL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AMAT - HLAL | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ADI - HLAL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +15.32% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
More | ||||