HLBZF
Price
$236.94
Change
+$13.79 (+6.18%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
VMC
Price
$266.24
Change
+$0.53 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
36.1B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLBZF vs VMC

Header iconHLBZF vs VMC Comparison
Open Charts HLBZF vs VMCBanner chart's image
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$236.94
Change+$13.79 (+6.18%)
Volume$6
Capitalization15.13B
Vulcan Materials Company(Holding Company)
Price$266.24
Change+$0.53 (+0.20%)
Volume$421.72K
Capitalization36.1B
HLBZF vs VMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLBZF vs. VMC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLBZF is a StrongBuy and VMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HLBZF: $236.94 vs. VMC: $266.24)
Brand notoriety: HLBZF and VMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLBZF: 0% vs. VMC: 41%
Market capitalization -- HLBZF: $15.13B vs. VMC: $36.1B
HLBZF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $15.13B. VMC’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $36.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLBZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLBZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • VMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLBZF is a better buy in the long-term than VMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLBZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLBZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VMC is a better buy in the short-term than HLBZF.

Price Growth

HLBZF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.42% price change this week, while VMC (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLBZF is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

VMC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMC($36.1B) has a higher market cap than HLBZF($15.1B). VMC has higher P/E ratio than HLBZF: VMC (38.20) vs HLBZF (8.46). HLBZF YTD gains are higher at: 88.797 vs. VMC (3.921). HLBZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. VMC (2.04B). HLBZF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. VMC (931M). VMC has less debt than HLBZF: VMC (4.39B) vs HLBZF (8.71B). HLBZF has higher revenues than VMC: HLBZF (21.1B) vs VMC (7.78B).
HLBZFVMCHLBZF / VMC
Capitalization15.1B36.1B42%
EBITDA3.77B2.04B184%
Gain YTD88.7973.9212,265%
P/E Ratio8.4638.2022%
Revenue21.1B7.78B271%
Total Cash1.75B931M188%
Total Debt8.71B4.39B199%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLBZF vs VMC: Fundamental Ratings
HLBZF
VMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
917
SMR RATING
1..100
9561
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLBZF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VMC (74) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VMC’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as VMC (17) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to VMC’s over the last 12 months.

VMC's SMR Rating (61) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLBZF (95) in the null industry. This means that VMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

VMC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HLBZF (37) in the null industry. This means that VMC’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VMC (50) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLBZFVMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRO3.260.02
+0.62%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Sec Income Fund
TAFI25.090.03
+0.12%
AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF
XLE87.030.10
+0.12%
The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF
HRTS28.66-0.02
-0.05%
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
CARD3.72-0.11
-2.97%
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN

HLBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBZF and BRKWF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBZF and BRKWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBZF
1D Price
Change %
HLBZF100%
+6.18%
BRKWF - HLBZF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDLMY - HLBZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
VMC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
BCC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
CRH - HLBZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More

VMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMC has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VMC jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMC
1D Price
Change %
VMC100%
+0.20%
MLM - VMC
95%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
EXP - VMC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KNF - VMC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
CRH - VMC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CX - VMC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More