Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLQVX vs RMFCX
HLQVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLQVX vs RMFCX
HLQVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLQVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLQVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HLQVX (4.96B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HLQVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HLQVX (0.96). HLQVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HLQVX (36 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HLQVX (0.75). HLQVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 223.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLQVX: RMFCX (250) vs HLQVX (1000000). HLQVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. RMFCX (3.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.60 vs. HLQVX (27.76).
| HLQVX | RMFCX | HLQVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.044 | 7.417 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.96B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 3.69 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.95 | 33.94 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.76 | 34.60 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.18 | 91.73 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement