Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLQVX vs RMFCX
HLQVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLQVX vs RMFCX
HLQVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLQVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLQVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HLQVX (5.16B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HLQVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HLQVX (1.09). HLQVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HLQVX (35 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HLQVX (0.75). HLQVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 185.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLQVX: RMFCX (250) vs HLQVX (1000000). HLQVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.83 vs. RMFCX (9.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. HLQVX (20.59).
| HLQVX | RMFCX | HLQVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.104 | 6.368 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.16B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.83 | 9.24 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.18 | 34.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.59 | 35.66 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.20 | 96.09 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement