Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLQVX vs RMFCX
HLQVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLQVX vs RMFCX
HLQVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLQVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLQVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HLQVX (5.08B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HLQVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HLQVX (1.09). HLQVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HLQVX (35 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HLQVX (0.75). HLQVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 185.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLQVX: RMFCX (250) vs HLQVX (1000000). HLQVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.88 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. HLQVX (13.63).
| HLQVX | RMFCX | HLQVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.007 | 6.510 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.08B | 115B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.88 | 10.31 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.87 | 35.49 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | 34.04 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.76 | 92.67 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement