It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
HLT (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +0.37% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.56%.
HLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
HLT | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLT | LCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | 7 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 7 days ago53% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 7 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 7 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 7 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 7 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago72% | 7 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 18 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 7 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 7 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLT has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLT jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LCF | 100% | N/A | ||
MSFT - LCF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
AMZN - LCF | 69% Closely correlated | -4.19% | ||
GOOG - LCF | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
HLT - LCF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
META - LCF | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.00% | ||
More |