Advertisement
HLT vs WH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) vs. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HLT has delivered approximately 53% returns over the past year, far outpacing WH's 3% gain, driven by strong luxury segment demand.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks rising, with WH up about 13% in the past month compared to HLT's 11%.
- HLT trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 55 versus WH's 34, signaling greater growth expectations.
- WH provides a higher dividend yield of nearly 2%, attractive for income-focused investors.
- Both operate in the hotel franchising sector, but HLT emphasizes luxury brands while WH focuses on economy and midscale properties.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight HLT's superior long-term momentum.
Introduction
In the competitive hospitality sector, HLT and WH represent contrasting approaches to hotel franchising and management. HLT, with its upscale portfolio, appeals to growth-oriented investors betting on premium travel recovery, while WH, emphasizing value brands, attracts those seeking stability and dividends. This stock comparison analyzes recent performance, business models, and market positioning to aid traders evaluating relative opportunities in a rebounding travel environment. Investors tracking consumer cyclical stocks, particularly lodging peers, will find insights into momentum, valuation, and sector dynamics.
HLT Overview and Recent Performance
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is a leading global hospitality company operating through management, franchising, and ownership segments. Its portfolio spans luxury brands like Waldorf Astoria to focused-service options like Hampton, serving diverse travelers. In recent market activity, HLT shares have climbed around 11% over the past month and 17% year-to-date (YTD), trading near $336 with a $77 billion market capitalization. Year-over-year gains exceed 53%, fueled by expansion deals such as a 125-hotel partnership in India and anticipation for quarterly earnings. Sentiment remains positive amid sustained travel demand, though elevated P/E ratios reflect growth premiums and sensitivity to economic cycles.
WH Overview and Recent Performance
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) functions primarily as a hotel franchisor, licensing economy and midscale brands like Super 8, Days Inn, and Ramada to third-party owners worldwide. This asset-light model emphasizes loyalty programs and managed services. Shares have advanced about 13% in recent weeks and 14% YTD, hovering around $86 with a $6.5 billion market cap. One-year returns stand at roughly 3%, lagging broader sector peers but supported by steady franchise growth and a 2% dividend yield. Performance reflects resilience in value lodging amid fluctuating leisure travel, with lower volatility indicated by a beta of 0.71.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from over 350 bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this dynamic section, chosen for their suitability to prevailing market conditions like volatility levels (low, medium, high) and analysis types (technical or fundamental). These bots employ varied strategies, timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, and styles including signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents. Users can filter by asset class or performance metrics to copy trade top performers. This resource empowers traders with data-driven tools tailored to current environments. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for hands-on access to these advanced systems.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both HLT and WH thrive in hotel franchising but diverge in scale and positioning: HLT's luxury-heavy model drives higher revenue growth (ttm $4.95B vs. $1.43B) and profit margins (29% vs. 14%), while WH prioritizes midscale efficiency. Recent momentum favors WH slightly short-term, but HLT dominates longer trends. Risk profiles differ, with WH's lower beta offering stability against HLT's cyclical exposure. Sector-wise, both benefit from travel recovery, yet HLT garners stronger analyst targets ($341 vs. $100). Trade-offs include HLT's growth potential versus WH's yield and valuation discount.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors HLT over WH, citing consistent upward trends, superior year-over-year performance, and catalysts like international expansions and earnings momentum. While WH shows short-term resilience and income appeal, HLT's scale and positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in a strengthening hospitality cycle.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLT is a Buy and WH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HLT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- WH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HLT (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while WH (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -3.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
WH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Cable/Satellite TV (+0.52% weekly)Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.
| HLT | WH | HLT / WH | |
| Capitalization | 78.8B | 5.94B | 1,326% |
| EBITDA | 3B | 475M | 632% |
| Gain YTD | 20.548 | 5.643 | 364% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.82 | 31.50 | 168% |
| Revenue | 12.3B | 1.44B | 854% |
| Total Cash | 564M | 79M | 714% |
| Total Debt | 13.1B | 2.65B | 494% |
HLT | WH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WH's Valuation (62) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HLT (69). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to HLT’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for WH (82). This means that HLT’s stock grew significantly faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as WH (30). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to WH’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WH (53). This means that HLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WH’s over the last 12 months.
WH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HLT (26). This means that WH’s stock grew similarly to HLT’s over the last 12 months.
| HLT | WH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 52% | 11 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
HLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLT has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLT jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
WH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WH has been closely correlated with CHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WH jumps, then CHH could also see price increases.