CHH
Price
$104.37
Change
-$0.20 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.71B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLT
Price
$327.27
Change
+$6.45 (+2.01%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.21B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHH vs HLT

CHH vs HLT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Choice Hotels International (CHH) vs. Hilton Worldwide Holdings (HLT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Choice Hotels International (CHH) operates primarily as a franchisor with a broad portfolio of midscale and economy brands, emphasizing franchisee support and owner returns in the lodging sector.
  • Hilton Worldwide Holdings (HLT) manages a larger, more premium global brand portfolio with significant exposure to management and franchise fees, benefiting from a wider geographic footprint and loyalty program scale.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks participating in hospitality sector movements, with HLT demonstrating stronger year-to-date gains relative to broader benchmarks amid steady demand trends.
  • CHH offers a more concentrated U.S.-focused exposure with potentially higher sensitivity to domestic travel patterns and franchisee economics compared to HLT's diversified international presence.
  • Risk factors include sector-wide exposure to economic cycles, interest rates, and consumer discretionary spending, with HLT carrying larger absolute scale and CHH facing greater relative volatility due to its smaller market capitalization.
  • Market sentiment for both remains tied to lodging industry fundamentals such as occupancy rates and revenue per available room (RevPAR), with no single dominant catalyst differentiating the pair in recent weeks.

Introduction

Choice Hotels International (CHH) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings (HLT) represent two distinct approaches within the lodging industry, making them relevant for investors and traders seeking exposure to hospitality stocks. CHH focuses on franchising across economy and midscale segments, while HLT emphasizes premium brands with management and franchise operations on a global scale. This comparison appeals to market participants evaluating relative performance, sector positioning, and risk-return profiles in the current environment, particularly those monitoring consumer discretionary trends and travel demand indicators.

CHH Overview and Recent Performance

Choice Hotels International (CHH) is a leading franchisor of hotel brands spanning economy to upper-midscale segments, including Comfort, Quality, and Cambria. The company generates revenue primarily through franchise fees and royalties rather than direct hotel ownership. In recent weeks, CHH stock has reflected broader lodging sector dynamics, with performance influenced by domestic travel patterns and franchisee profitability metrics. Market activity has shown sensitivity to U.S. economic indicators and consumer spending trends, contributing to measured price behavior amid stable but not accelerating demand signals.

HLT Overview and Recent Performance

Hilton Worldwide Holdings (HLT) operates an extensive portfolio of luxury, lifestyle, and focused-service brands worldwide, with the majority of earnings derived from management and franchise agreements plus its Hilton Honors loyalty program. Recent market activity has positioned HLT shares in line with hospitality peers, supported by global travel recovery elements and brand expansion initiatives. Performance has been shaped by occupancy and RevPAR trends across regions, with the larger scale providing some buffer against localized fluctuations observed in recent periods.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page at Trending AI Robots showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across equities, with only the highest-performing and most suitable options featured in the trending section based on current market fit. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options with varying risk levels and historical outcomes. The platform provides transparent metrics on win rates, drawdowns, and returns to assist informed decision-making. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot profiles.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business model terms, CHH relies almost exclusively on franchising with lower capital intensity, while HLT combines management contracts, franchising, and limited ownership for diversified revenue streams. Growth drivers differ as CHH benefits from brand conversions and owner economics in value segments, whereas HLT leverages premium positioning, global expansion, and loyalty-driven repeat business. Recent momentum has favored larger peers like HLT in relative terms due to scale advantages, though both face similar sector headwinds from interest rate sensitivity and discretionary spending variability. Risk factors include CHH’s higher concentration in U.S. markets versus HLT’s broader international exposure, with market sentiment reflecting ongoing monitoring of travel recovery indicators across the lodging space.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability in recent market activity, and positioning within the hospitality sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to HLT due to its larger scale, diversified geographic footprint, and established loyalty infrastructure, which may support more consistent performance metrics compared to CHH’s more concentrated profile. This assessment remains subject to evolving market conditions and does not constitute investment guidance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHH vs. HLT commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHH is a Hold and HLT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CHH: $104.57 vs. HLT: $320.82)
Brand notoriety: CHH: Not notable vs. HLT: Notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHH: 66% vs. HLT: 100%
Market capitalization -- CHH: $4.71B vs. HLT: $72.21B
CHH [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $4.71B. HLT’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $72.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $91.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $21.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLT is a better buy in the long-term than CHH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HLT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLT is a better buy in the short-term than CHH.

Price Growth

CHH (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -4.70% price change this week, while HLT (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHH is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

HLT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+1.92% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLT($72.2B) has a higher market cap than CHH($4.71B). HLT has higher P/E ratio than CHH: HLT (47.11) vs CHH (14.81). HLT YTD gains are higher at: 11.791 vs. CHH (10.701). HLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.09B vs. CHH (604M). CHH has less debt than HLT: CHH (2.11B) vs HLT (14B). HLT has higher revenues than CHH: HLT (12.5B) vs CHH (1.61B).
CHHHLTCHH / HLT
Capitalization4.71B72.2B7%
EBITDA604M3.09B20%
Gain YTD10.70111.79191%
P/E Ratio14.8147.1131%
Revenue1.61B12.5B13%
Total CashN/A1.01B-
Total Debt2.11B14B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHH vs HLT: Fundamental Ratings
CHH
HLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7534
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLT's Valuation (72) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CHH (75). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to CHH’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHH (100). This means that HLT’s stock grew significantly faster than CHH’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CHH (4). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to CHH’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as CHH (60). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to CHH’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHH (75). This means that HLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHHHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACWX77.910.16
+0.21%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF
SMDV78.590.16
+0.20%
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
XDEC43.530.04
+0.09%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mdt Bfr ETF Dec
KGRN23.85-0.18
-0.75%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF
LMTL40.99-1.24
-2.93%
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF

CHH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHH has been closely correlated with WH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHH jumps, then WH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHH
1D Price
Change %
CHH100%
-0.92%
WH - CHH
66%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
IHG - CHH
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
HLT - CHH
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
H - CHH
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
GHG - CHH
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More

HLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLT has been closely correlated with H. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLT jumps, then H could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLT
1D Price
Change %
HLT100%
-0.53%
H - HLT
75%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
IHG - HLT
67%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
WH - HLT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
CHH - HLT
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
ATAT - HLT
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
More