It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNODK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODK’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.44% price change this week, while NODK (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.53%.
HMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| HMN | NODK | HMN / NODK | |
| Capitalization | 1.95B | 320M | 609% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.268 | 17.444 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.14 | 119.09 | 10% |
| Revenue | 1.64B | 273M | 601% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 189M | - |
| Total Debt | 594M | N/A | - |
HMN | NODK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HMN's Valuation (24) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (93). This means that HMN’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (100). This means that HMN’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
HMN's SMR Rating (69) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (100). This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.
NODK's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (45). This means that NODK’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
NODK's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for HMN (73). This means that NODK’s stock grew significantly faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.
| HMN | NODK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 6 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 6 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 49% | 16 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 54% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BULG | 36.64 | 3.19 | +9.54% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long BULL Daily ETF | |||
| FKU | 54.45 | 0.09 | +0.17% |
| First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| SIO | 25.74 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Touchstone Strategic Income ETF | |||
| YEAR | 50.31 | 0.03 | +0.05% |
| AB Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
| GLBL | 28.60 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NODK has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NODK jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NODK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NODK | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| BNT - NODK | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| DGICA - NODK | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| BOW - NODK | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| UFCS - NODK | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| HMN - NODK | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||