Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQICX vs RMFEX
HQICX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HQICX vs RMFEX
HQICX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQICX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQICX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HQICX (4.84B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HQICX: RMFEX (1.45) vs HQICX (0.86). HQICX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HQICX (23 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HQICX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HQICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQICX: RMFEX (250) vs HQICX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. HQICX (4.96). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. HQICX (-2.90).
| HQICX | RMFEX | HQICX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.62 | 282% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.62 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.826 | 5.987 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.84B | 115B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.45 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 10.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.63 | 35.96 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.90 | 35.97 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.78 | 99.50 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement