Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQIIX vs RMEBX
HQIIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HQIIX vs RMEBX
HQIIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQIIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQIIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HQIIX (4.82B). HQIIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HQIIX (1.60) vs RMEBX (0.99). HQIIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HQIIX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HQIIX (0.76). HQIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HQIIX: RMEBX (250) vs HQIIX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. HQIIX (2.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. HQIIX (5.70).
| HQIIX | RMEBX | HQIIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.07 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.07 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.442 | 8.448 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.82B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.99 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 4.65 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.54 | 34.88 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.70 | 34.68 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.56 | 92.45 | 47% |