HRTG
Price
$29.37
Change
-$0.60 (-2.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
889.13M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAFT
Price
$103.39
Change
+$0.20 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRTG vs SAFT

HRTG vs SAFT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRTG vs. SAFT commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRTG is a Buy and SAFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (HRTG: $29.37 vs. SAFT: $103.39)
Brand notoriety: HRTG and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRTG: 59% vs. SAFT: 145%
Market capitalization -- HRTG: $889.13M vs. SAFT: $1.52B
HRTG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $889.13M. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $135.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRTG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HRTG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HRTG and SAFT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRTG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HRTG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRTG is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

HRTG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +5.57% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRTG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.46% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFT($1.52B) has a higher market cap than HRTG($889M). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than HRTG: SAFT (24.44) vs HRTG (4.50). SAFT YTD gains are higher at: 36.080 vs. HRTG (0.376). SAFT has more cash in the bank: 753M vs. HRTG (625M). SAFT has less debt than HRTG: SAFT (61.1M) vs HRTG (99M). SAFT has higher revenues than HRTG: SAFT (1.27B) vs HRTG (771M).
HRTGSAFTHRTG / SAFT
Capitalization889M1.52B59%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.37636.0801%
P/E Ratio4.5024.4418%
Revenue771M1.27B61%
Total Cash625M753M83%
Total Debt99M61.1M162%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRTG vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
HRTG
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2130
SMR RATING
1..100
2281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9413
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HRTG (32). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to HRTG’s over the last 12 months.

HRTG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (30). This means that HRTG’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

HRTG's SMR Rating (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (81). This means that HRTG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HRTG (43). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to HRTG’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for HRTG (94). This means that SAFT’s stock grew significantly faster than HRTG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRTGSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HRTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQH53.540.18
+0.33%
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF
TBX28.820.05
+0.17%
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
GSSC89.15-0.34
-0.38%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
LOUP85.11-1.11
-1.29%
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
BFJL17.17-0.22
-1.29%
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July

HRTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRTG has been loosely correlated with UVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRTG jumps, then UVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRTG
1D Price
Change %
HRTG100%
-2.00%
UVE - HRTG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
AFG - HRTG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
CB - HRTG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
WRB - HRTG
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
SAFT - HRTG
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with HMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then HMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.19%
HMN - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
HIG - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
THG - SAFT
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
AFG - SAFT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
L - SAFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More