HTGC
Price
$15.92
Change
-$0.09 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOAH
Price
$8.70
Change
-$0.18 (-2.03%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
597.22M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTGC vs NOAH

HTGC vs NOAH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTGC vs. NOAH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTGC is a Buy and NOAH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HTGC: $15.92 vs. NOAH: $8.70)
Brand notoriety: HTGC and NOAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTGC: 89% vs. NOAH: 78%
Market capitalization -- HTGC: $2.98B vs. NOAH: $597.22M
HTGC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.98B. NOAH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $597.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $159.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOAH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HTGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOAH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the long-term than NOAH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTGC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOAH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOAH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the short-term than NOAH.

Price Growth

HTGC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while NOAH (@Investment Managers) price change was -15.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

NOAH is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTGC($2.98B) has a higher market cap than NOAH($597M). HTGC has higher P/E ratio than NOAH: HTGC (8.89) vs NOAH (7.75). NOAH YTD gains are higher at: -7.089 vs. HTGC (-10.020). NOAH has higher revenues than HTGC: NOAH (2.62B) vs HTGC (434M).
HTGCNOAHHTGC / NOAH
Capitalization2.98B597M499%
EBITDAN/A827M-
Gain YTD-10.020-7.089141%
P/E Ratio8.897.75115%
Revenue434M2.62B17%
Total Cash57MN/A-
Total Debt2.55BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HTGC vs NOAH: Fundamental Ratings
HTGC
NOAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1664
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
3585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5372
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8887
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HTGC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOAH (76) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew significantly faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (85) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NOAH (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

NOAH's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HTGC (88) in the null industry. This means that NOAH’s stock grew similarly to HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTGCNOAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOAH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNOAX39.06N/A
N/A
Easterly Snow Long/Short Opportunity A
GSRAX11.79N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr A
FAYZX16.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
AVEEX17.83N/A
N/A
Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity Instl
CBFEX42.16-0.24
-0.57%
American Funds Global Balanced 529-E

NOAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOAH and SLRC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOAH and SLRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOAH
1D Price
Change %
NOAH100%
-2.03%
SLRC - NOAH
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
GBDC - NOAH
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIN - NOAH
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
HTGC - NOAH
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
ARCC - NOAH
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More