HTZ
Price
$6.40
Change
+$0.15 (+2.40%)
Updated
May 22, 12:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.39B
63 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$49.96
Change
+$0.36 (+0.73%)
Updated
May 22, 12:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTZ vs OMF

Header iconHTZ vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts HTZ vs OMFBanner chart's image
Hertz Global Holdings
Price$6.40
Change+$0.15 (+2.40%)
Volume$20.48K
Capitalization2.39B
OneMain Holdings
Price$49.96
Change+$0.36 (+0.73%)
Volume$202
Capitalization6.02B
HTZ vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTZ vs. OMF commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTZ is a Hold and OMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (HTZ: $6.25 vs. OMF: $49.60)
Brand notoriety: HTZ and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTZ: 37% vs. OMF: 71%
Market capitalization -- HTZ: $2.39B vs. OMF: $6.02B
HTZ [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $2.39B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than HTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than HTZ.

Price Growth

HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +6.84% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -5.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.63% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than HTZ($2.39B). OMF has higher P/E ratio than HTZ: OMF (9.44) vs HTZ (5.53). HTZ YTD gains are higher at: 70.765 vs. OMF (-1.018). HTZ has less debt than OMF: HTZ (17.8B) vs OMF (19.8B). HTZ has higher revenues than OMF: HTZ (9.37B) vs OMF (4.28B).
HTZOMFHTZ / OMF
Capitalization2.39B6.02B40%
EBITDA3.65BN/A-
Gain YTD70.765-1.018-6,953%
P/E Ratio5.539.4459%
Revenue9.37B4.28B219%
Total Cash764MN/A-
Total Debt17.8B19.8B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTZOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAGKX72.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Strategies K
ASRAX8.11N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Real Estate Income A
ACSMX10.68N/A
N/A
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap
FNWFX84.18-0.52
-0.61%
American Funds New World F3
EPLKX20.35-0.36
-1.74%
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class C

HTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTZ
1D Price
Change %
HTZ100%
-3.40%
CAR - HTZ
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
BBDC - HTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
LC - HTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
RKT - HTZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-7.06%
OMF - HTZ
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-3.13%
ENVA - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
-4.02%
COF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-4.60%
AXP - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
SLM - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
DFS - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More