Advertisement
HUBB vs PLPC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBB is a Buy and PLPC is a StrongBuy.
| HUBB | PLPC | HUBB / PLPC | |
| Capitalization | 23.4B | 1.94B | 1,205% |
| EBITDA | 1.47B | 82.9M | 1,771% |
| Gain YTD | 0.492 | 93.100 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.19 | 44.78 | 58% |
| Revenue | 6.22B | 740M | 841% |
| Total Cash | 395M | 76.2M | 518% |
| Total Debt | 5.56B | 51.5M | 10,790% |
HUBB | PLPC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBB's Valuation (53) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as PLPC (72) in the Building Products industry. This means that HUBB’s stock grew similarly to PLPC’s over the last 12 months.
PLPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as HUBB (28) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLPC’s stock grew similarly to HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
HUBB's SMR Rating (40) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLPC (75) in the Building Products industry. This means that HUBB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLPC’s over the last 12 months.
PLPC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as HUBB (59) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLPC’s stock grew similarly to HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
PLPC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBB (52) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBB | PLPC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 41% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PLPC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HUBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLPC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLPC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- PLPC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBB (@Electrical Products) experienced а -3.98% price change this week, while PLPC (@Electrical Products) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -5.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBB is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
PLPC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-5.54% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
Advertisement
HUBB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBB has been loosely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBB jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBB | 100% | -3.91% | ||
| NVT - HUBB | 64% Loosely correlated | -9.69% | ||
| AEIS - HUBB | 61% Loosely correlated | -11.45% | ||
| VRT - HUBB | 58% Loosely correlated | -7.63% | ||
| AYI - HUBB | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| ENS - HUBB | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.63% | ||
More | ||||
PLPC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLPC has been loosely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLPC jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLPC | 100% | -5.97% | ||
| NVT - PLPC | 52% Loosely correlated | -9.69% | ||
| POWL - PLPC | 52% Loosely correlated | -6.47% | ||
| HUBB - PLPC | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| AEIS - PLPC | 51% Loosely correlated | -11.45% | ||
| VRT - PLPC | 45% Loosely correlated | -7.63% | ||
More | ||||