HUBS
Price
$483.17
Change
+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
25.46B
65 days until earnings call
NTWK
Price
$4.05
Change
-$0.12 (-2.88%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
47.42M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs NTWK

Header iconHUBS vs NTWK Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs NTWKBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$483.17
Change+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Volume$817.6K
Capitalization25.46B
NetSol Technologies
Price$4.05
Change-$0.12 (-2.88%)
Volume$54.47K
Capitalization47.42M
HUBS vs NTWK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. NTWK commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and NTWK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $483.17 vs. NTWK: $4.05)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and NTWK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 91% vs. NTWK: 117%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $25.46B vs. NTWK: $47.42M
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $25.46B. NTWK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $47.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTWK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTWK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTWK is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTWK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NTWK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than NTWK.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while NTWK (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

NTWK is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($25.5B) has a higher market cap than NTWK($47.4M). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than NTWK: HUBS (7023.44) vs NTWK (202.50). NTWK YTD gains are higher at: 54.580 vs. HUBS (-30.656). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. NTWK (5.24M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. NTWK (18.8M). NTWK has less debt than HUBS: NTWK (9.45M) vs HUBS (281M). HUBS has higher revenues than NTWK: HUBS (2.85B) vs NTWK (64.1M).
HUBSNTWKHUBS / NTWK
Capitalization25.5B47.4M53,797%
EBITDA126M5.24M2,404%
Gain YTD-30.65654.580-56%
P/E Ratio7023.44202.503,468%
Revenue2.85B64.1M4,443%
Total Cash1.67B18.8M8,883%
Total Debt281M9.45M2,975%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs NTWK: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
NTWK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6982
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
804
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5039

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTWK's Valuation (82) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100). This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as NTWK (82). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to NTWK’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as NTWK (91). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to NTWK’s over the last 12 months.

NTWK's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (84). This means that NTWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

NTWK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (80). This means that NTWK’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSNTWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDF31.25N/A
N/A
Range India Financials ETF
RAFE39.49-0.06
-0.14%
PIMCO RAFI ESG US ETF
MFDX36.64-0.07
-0.18%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
SNPE58.11-0.30
-0.51%
Xtrackers S&P 500 Scrd & Scrn ETF
DFII23.35-0.78
-3.25%
Ft Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.43%
CRM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
NOW - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
S - HUBS
66%
Loosely correlated
+7.10%
CLSK - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More

NTWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTWK has been loosely correlated with PDFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTWK jumps, then PDFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTWK
1D Price
Change %
NTWK100%
-2.88%
PDFS - NTWK
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
HUBS - NTWK
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
GTM - NTWK
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
WIX - NTWK
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
TTD - NTWK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
More