Advertisement
HUBS vs NTWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and NTWK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTWK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTWK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTWK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NTWK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.99% price change this week, while NTWK (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
NTWK is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HUBS | NTWK | HUBS / NTWK | |
| Capitalization | 32.3B | 31.6M | 102,215% |
| EBITDA | -81.23M | 4.23M | -1,920% |
| Gain YTD | -20.406 | 8.015 | -255% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 10.79 | - |
| Revenue | 2.17B | 56.8M | 3,820% |
| Total Cash | 1.39B | 15.7M | 8,841% |
| Total Debt | 788M | 7.79M | 10,110% |
HUBS | NTWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTWK's Valuation (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100). This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTWK (100). This means that HUBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTWK’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (90) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as NTWK (90). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to NTWK’s over the last 12 months.
NTWK's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (82). This means that NTWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
NTWK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (78). This means that NTWK’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | NTWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -2.67% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 68% Closely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| SHOP - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| CLSK - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| COIN - HUBS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
NTWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTWK and PDFS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTWK and PDFS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTWK | 100% | -3.41% | ||
| PDFS - NTWK | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
| NTNX - NTWK | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
| GTM - NTWK | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.30% | ||
| OTEX - NTWK | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| HUBS - NTWK | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
More | ||||