Advertisement
HUBS vs PRCH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and PRCH is a Hold.
| HUBS | PRCH | HUBS / PRCH | |
| Capitalization | 10.8B | 1.81B | 598% |
| EBITDA | 333M | 69.4M | 480% |
| Gain YTD | -46.145 | 74.151 | -62% |
| P/E Ratio | 76.91 | 24.48 | 314% |
| Revenue | 3.45B | 541M | 638% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 218M | 614% |
| Total Debt | 237M | 405M | 59% |
HUBS | PRCH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PRCH (85) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to PRCH’s over the last 12 months.
PRCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PRCH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PRCH (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to PRCH’s over the last 12 months.
PRCH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (56) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PRCH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
PRCH's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PRCH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | PRCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PRCH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PRCH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRCH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PRCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.09% price change this week, while PRCH (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.39%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
PRCH is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.56% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.68% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -5.86% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||