HUT
Price
$26.51
Change
+$0.16 (+0.61%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
SLNH
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
14.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs SLNH

Header iconHUT vs SLNH Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs SLNHBanner chart's image
Hut 8
Price$26.51
Change+$0.16 (+0.61%)
Volume$4.31M
Capitalization2.8B
Soluna Holdings
Price$0.47
Change-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Volume$462.34K
Capitalization14.18M
HUT vs SLNH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUT vs. SLNH commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Buy and SLNH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HUT: $26.51 vs. SLNH: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: HUT and SLNH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 82% vs. SLNH: 19%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $2.8B vs. SLNH: $14.18M
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.8B. SLNH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $14.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than SLNH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLNH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than SLNH.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +24.05% price change this week, while SLNH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.08% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($2.8B) has a higher market cap than SLNH($14.2M). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 29.380 vs. SLNH (-77.605). HUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367M vs. SLNH (-44.67M). HUT has more cash in the bank: 216M vs. SLNH (9.88M). SLNH has less debt than HUT: SLNH (23.6M) vs HUT (362M). HUT has higher revenues than SLNH: HUT (550M) vs SLNH (27.9M).
HUTSLNHHUT / SLNH
Capitalization2.8B14.2M19,704%
EBITDA367M-44.67M-822%
Gain YTD29.380-77.605-38%
P/E Ratio18.54N/A-
Revenue550M27.9M1,971%
Total Cash216M9.88M2,187%
Total Debt362M23.6M1,534%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT vs SLNH: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
SLNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3692
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUT's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (84). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNH (92). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTSLNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMCX8.720.04
+0.46%
Royce Micro-Cap Consult
IGIFX44.150.14
+0.32%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc F1
MURRX24.57N/A
N/A
MFS Utilities R2
TOLIX16.56N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Inst
MIGPX19.48N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Insgt A

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
+0.61%
RIOT - HUT
81%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
HIVE - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
CIFR - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
IREN - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+3.06%
BITF - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
More

SLNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLNH has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLNH jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNH
1D Price
Change %
SLNH100%
-1.20%
BITF - SLNH
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
HIVE - SLNH
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MARA - SLNH
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
HUT - SLNH
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
ANY - SLNH
43%
Loosely correlated
+9.99%
More