HUT
Price
$16.33
Change
-$0.68 (-4.00%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
985.18M
SLNH
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.03 (-4.92%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs SLNH

Header iconHUT vs SLNH Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs SLNHBanner chart's image
Hut 8
Price$16.33
Change-$0.68 (-4.00%)
Volume$45.71K
Capitalization985.18M
Soluna Holdings
Price$0.58
Change-$0.03 (-4.92%)
Volume$657
Capitalization7.66M
HUT vs SLNH Comparison Chart
Loading...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUT vs. SLNH commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Buy and SLNH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HUT: $16.32 vs. SLNH: $0.58)
Brand notoriety: HUT and SLNH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 128% vs. SLNH: 364%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $985.18M vs. SLNH: $7.66M
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $985.18M. SLNH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than SLNH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLNH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than SLNH.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +6.11% price change this week, while SLNH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -11.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

SLNH is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.60% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($985M) has a higher market cap than SLNH($7.66M). HUT YTD gains are higher at: -16.984 vs. SLNH (-71.014). SLNH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -33.05M vs. HUT (-80.09M). HUT has more cash in the bank: 21.1M vs. SLNH (5.63M). SLNH has less debt than HUT: SLNH (21.4M) vs HUT (79.5M). HUT has higher revenues than SLNH: HUT (77M) vs SLNH (15.1M).
HUTSLNHHUT / SLNH
Capitalization985M7.66M12,852%
EBITDA-80.09M-33.05M242%
Gain YTD-16.984-71.01424%
P/E Ratio12.84N/A-
Revenue77M15.1M510%
Total Cash21.1M5.63M375%
Total Debt79.5M21.4M371%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT vs SLNH: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
SLNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4495
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUT's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (72). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (96). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNH (95). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

SLNH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (70). This means that SLNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTSLNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHSX36.69N/A
N/A
Hartford Healthcare R4
SAIFX39.41N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Large Cap Value I
JARSX15.59N/A
N/A
Easterly Global Real Estate R6
PCUZX60.00N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Z
ILVBX10.02N/A
N/A
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Val A

SLNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLNH has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLNH jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNH
1D Price
Change %
SLNH100%
-3.38%
BITF - SLNH
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
CLSK - SLNH
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
HIVE - SLNH
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.19%
HUT - SLNH
49%
Loosely correlated
+5.92%
MARA - SLNH
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More