HWC
Price
$62.59
Change
-$0.48 (-0.76%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.3B
34 days until earnings call
OSBC
Price
$17.82
Change
-$0.22 (-1.22%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
938.23M
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs OSBC

Header iconHWC vs OSBC Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs OSBCBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$62.59
Change-$0.48 (-0.76%)
Volume$957.8K
Capitalization5.3B
Old Second Ban
Price$17.82
Change-$0.22 (-1.22%)
Volume$185.01K
Capitalization938.23M
HWC vs OSBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. OSBC commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Hold and OSBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $62.59 vs. OSBC: $17.82)
Brand notoriety: HWC and OSBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 125% vs. OSBC: 91%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $5.3B vs. OSBC: $938.23M
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.3B. OSBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $938.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOSBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OSBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than OSBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OSBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSBC is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.13% price change this week, while OSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

OSBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.31B) has a higher market cap than OSBC($938M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than OSBC: HWC (11.55) vs OSBC (9.74). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 17.131 vs. OSBC (1.275). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. OSBC (52.7M). OSBC has less debt than HWC: OSBC (85.3M) vs HWC (849M). HWC has higher revenues than OSBC: HWC (1.47B) vs OSBC (287M).
HWCOSBCHWC / OSBC
Capitalization5.31B938M566%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.1311.2751,343%
P/E Ratio11.559.74119%
Revenue1.47B287M511%
Total Cash513M52.7M973%
Total Debt849M85.3M995%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs OSBC: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
OSBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2128
SMR RATING
1..100
1223
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OSBC (50). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to OSBC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OSBC (28). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to OSBC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OSBC (23). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to OSBC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OSBC (51). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to OSBC’s over the last 12 months.

OSBC's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (49). This means that OSBC’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCOSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSLNX20.980.06
+0.29%
Janus Henderson Global Select N
HNVIX36.17N/A
N/A
Heartland Value Plus Institutional
SSIAX33.77N/A
N/A
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced A
GCEJX9.96N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Inv
DOXFX65.25-0.02
-0.03%
Dodge & Cox International Stock X

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.76%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
UCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
FULT - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
More