Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$32.23
Change-$0.16 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.49M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. HWCIX (82.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.70) vs RMEBX (1.05). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWCIX (1.01). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. HWCIX (1.49). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.41 vs. RMEBX (58.09).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.331 | 14.628 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.05 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | 7.96 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.53 | 43.02 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.41 | 58.09 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.17 | 92.06 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement