Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$29.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.45M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.68
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCIX (76.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.81) vs RMEBX (1.11). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWCIX (1.01). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. HWCIX (0.09). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 96.24 vs. RMEBX (53.14).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.024 | 9.293 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.11 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 10.92 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 25.02 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.24 | 53.14 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.96 | 74.65 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement