Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.54M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.74
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.66B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HWCIX (79.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.72) vs RMEBX (1.05). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HWCIX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. HWCIX (-5.88). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 71.10 vs. RMEBX (49.78).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.497 | 13.325 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.05 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | 4.73 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.74 | 25.82 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.10 | 49.78 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.55 | 84.34 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement