Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.56M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCIX (80.6M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.81) vs RMEBX (1.11). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWCIX (1.01). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. HWCIX (-1.11). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 103.97 vs. RMEBX (53.09).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 11.509 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.11 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 6.81 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.45 | 28.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.97 | 53.09 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.95 | 89.52 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement