Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCIX (88.2M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.24) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HWCIX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. RMEBX (5.30). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.14 vs. RMEBX (34.49).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.151 | 8.295 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.2M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.99 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.48 | 5.30 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.30 | 34.60 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.14 | 34.49 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.35 | 89.46 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers