Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCIX (84.6M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.36) vs RMEBX (1.04). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HWCIX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. RMEBX (9.16). HWCIX (35.28) and RMEBX (33.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.391 | 6.885 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.6M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 9.16 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.75 | 33.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 33.79 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.48 | 92.81 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement