Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCIX (88.9M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.31) vs RMEBX (0.99). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HWCIX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. RMEBX (9.44). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.52 vs. RMEBX (36.32).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.583 | 10.825 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.99 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.17 | 9.44 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 38.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.52 | 36.32 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.22 | 91.39 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement