Ad is loading...
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$28.54
Change+$0.43 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.16M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. HWCIX (78.2M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.93) vs RMFCX (1.37). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. HWCIX (-6.87). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.10 vs. RMFCX (56.16).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.645 | 1.270 | -129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.2M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.37 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.87 | 5.35 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | 17.29 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.10 | 56.16 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.04 | 60.33 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers