Ad is loading...
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$26.32
Change-$1.08 (-3.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.15M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.20
Change-$1.36 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. HWCIX (77.2M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.86) vs RMFCX (1.34). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. HWCIX (-9.14). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.15 vs. RMFCX (55.06).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.129 | -1.578 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.2M | 98.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.34 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.14 | 3.11 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.79 | 7.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.15 | 55.06 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.91 | 56.78 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers