Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.54M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.41
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.66B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HWCIX (79.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.72) vs RMFCX (1.21). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. HWCIX (-5.88). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 71.10 vs. RMFCX (50.88).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.497 | 13.504 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.21 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | 4.88 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.74 | 26.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.10 | 50.88 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.55 | 86.17 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement