Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$29.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.45M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCIX (76.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.81) vs RMFCX (1.26). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. HWCIX (0.09). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 96.24 vs. RMFCX (54.27).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.024 | 9.394 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.26 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 11.08 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 25.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.24 | 54.27 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.96 | 76.20 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement