Ad is loading...
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$29.97
Change+$0.34 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.65M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.46
Change+$0.70 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.51B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. HWCIX (92.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HWCIX: RMFCX (1.69) vs HWCIX (1.43). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (26.00) and RMFCX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. HWCIX (2.88). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 84.51 vs. RMFCX (56.45).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.674 | 3.975 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.69 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.88 | 10.12 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.64 | 17.07 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.51 | 56.45 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.37 | 63.86 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...