Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$32.23
Change-$0.16 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.49M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. HWCIX (82.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.70) vs RMFCX (1.20). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. HWCIX (1.49). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.41 vs. RMFCX (59.28).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.331 | 14.779 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.20 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | 8.11 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.53 | 43.61 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.41 | 59.28 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.17 | 93.90 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement