Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.56M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCIX (80.6M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.81) vs RMFCX (1.26). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. HWCIX (-1.11). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 103.97 vs. RMFCX (54.21).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 11.642 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.26 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 6.98 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.45 | 29.24 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.97 | 54.21 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.95 | 91.22 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement