Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCIX (84.1M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.16). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. RMFCX (7.69). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.74 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.158 | 9.325 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.43 | 7.69 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.48 | 32.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.74 | 37.08 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.88 | 91.03 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement