Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCIX (83.6M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.16). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. HWCIX (7.62). RMFCX (37.00) and HWCIX (36.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.159 | 9.240 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.6M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 9.55 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.94 | 35.79 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.45 | 37.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.66 | 95.20 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers