Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCIX (88.9M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.15). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. RMFCX (9.56). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.52 vs. RMFCX (37.27).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.583 | 10.915 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.17 | 9.56 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 38.97 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.52 | 37.27 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.22 | 93.12 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement