Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCIX (84.6M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.19). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. RMFCX (9.31). HWCIX (35.28) and RMFCX (34.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.391 | 6.953 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.6M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.19 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 9.31 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.75 | 34.52 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 34.71 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.48 | 94.50 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers