Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCIX (88.2M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.24) vs RMFCX (1.15). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. RMFCX (5.44). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.14 vs. RMFCX (35.44).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.151 | 8.402 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.2M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.48 | 5.44 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.30 | 35.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.14 | 35.44 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.35 | 91.22 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement