Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFEX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.69
Change+$0.11 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.54M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.81
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.66B
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HWCIX (79.5M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: HWCIX (1.72) vs RMFEX (1.46). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. HWCIX (-5.88). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 71.10 vs. RMFEX (53.22).
| HWCIX | RMFEX | HWCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.497 | 13.794 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.46 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | 5.22 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.74 | 27.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.10 | 53.22 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.55 | 93.60 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement