Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCIX (88.9M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HWCIX: RMFEX (1.41) vs HWCIX (1.31). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. RMFEX (9.92). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.52 vs. RMFEX (39.44).
| HWCIX | RMFEX | HWCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.583 | 11.123 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.41 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.17 | 9.92 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 40.31 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.52 | 39.44 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.22 | 101.32 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement