Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWCIX (84.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than HWCIX: RMFEX (1.45) vs HWCIX (1.36). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. RMFEX (9.66). RMFEX (36.84) and HWCIX (35.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWCIX | RMFEX | HWCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.391 | 7.089 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.6M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 9.66 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.75 | 35.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.28 | 36.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.48 | 102.59 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers