Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFEX
HWCIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWCIX (84.1M). RMFEX (1.42) and HWCIX (1.38) have matching dividends . HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: HWCIX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFEX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). HWCIX (8.43) and RMFEX (8.04) have marching annual gain over last year. HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.74 vs. RMFEX (39.23).
| HWCIX | RMFEX | HWCIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.158 | 9.507 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.42 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.43 | 8.04 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.48 | 33.67 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.74 | 39.23 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.88 | 99.14 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers