Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSAX vs SSGSX
HWSAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSAX vs SSGSX
HWSAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. HWSAX (898M). HWSAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSAX (0.55) vs SSGSX (0.52). HWSAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSAX (26 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and HWSAX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HWSAX (41.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than HWSAX (5%) vs HWSAX (5%). HWSAX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.88 vs. SSGSX (17.91). HWSAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.86 vs. SSGSX (-0.02).
| HWSAX | SSGSX | HWSAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.413 | 20.027 | 147% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 898M | 4.36B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.52 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.88 | 17.91 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.83 | 15.43 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.86 | -0.02 | -297,063% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.35 | 37.68 | 272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement