Ad is loading...
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$44.70
Change-$2.53 (-5.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.41M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$38.61
Change-$1.79 (-4.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.42B vs. HWSCX (710M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.74) vs SSGSX (0.52). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.20 vs. HWSCX (-19.73). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 75.15 vs. SSGSX (18.77).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.355 | -12.987 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 710M | 5.42B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.52 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.73 | -14.20 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.78 | -13.85 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.15 | 18.77 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.27 | 3.07 | -367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...