Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$53.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets749.57M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.37B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.37B vs. HWSCX (750M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.70) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.12 vs. SSGSX (-5.17). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.33 vs. SSGSX (14.10).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.311 | -4.932 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 750M | 5.37B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.50 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.12 | -5.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.43 | -7.99 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.33 | 14.10 | 449% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.14 | 12.22 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement