Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$56.31
Change-$0.21 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets789.24M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. HWSCX (789M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.70) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.93 vs. HWSCX (-5.14). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 69.67 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.687 | 1.852 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 789M | 5.63B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.50 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.14 | -3.93 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.47 | -0.85 | 409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.67 | 20.68 | 337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.33 | 24.03 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement