Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$56.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets760.35M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.99
Change-$0.08 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. HWSCX (760M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.68) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.40 vs. HWSCX (-6.46). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.28 vs. SSGSX (22.15).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.045 | 1.378 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 5.52B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.48 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.46 | -4.40 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.59 | 7.68 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.28 | 22.15 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.38 | 20.72 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement