HYFM
Price
$3.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.46M
OSK
Price
$98.50
Change
-$3.93 (-3.84%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.08B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYFM vs OSK

Header iconHYFM vs OSK Comparison
Open Charts HYFM vs OSKBanner chart's image
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
Price$3.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$148
Capitalization49.46M
Oshkosh
Price$98.50
Change-$3.93 (-3.84%)
Volume$5.65K
Capitalization8.08B
HYFM vs OSK Comparison Chart
Loading...
HYFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYFM vs. OSK commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYFM is a Hold and OSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (HYFM: $3.18 vs. OSK: $102.43)
Brand notoriety: HYFM and OSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYFM: 5% vs. OSK: 73%
Market capitalization -- HYFM: $49.46M vs. OSK: $8.08B
HYFM [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $49.46M. OSK’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $8.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYFM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYFM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OSK is a better buy in the long-term than HYFM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYFM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYFM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSK is a better buy in the short-term than HYFM.

Price Growth

HYFM (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while OSK (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

HYFM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

OSK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-0.37% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSK($8.08B) has a higher market cap than HYFM($49.5M). HYFM has higher P/E ratio than OSK: HYFM (25.91) vs OSK (13.56). OSK YTD gains are higher at: 4.609 vs. HYFM (-45.172). OSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. HYFM (-17.51M). OSK has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. HYFM (30.3M). HYFM has less debt than OSK: HYFM (184M) vs OSK (772M). OSK has higher revenues than HYFM: OSK (9.66B) vs HYFM (227M).
HYFMOSKHYFM / OSK
Capitalization49.5M8.08B1%
EBITDA-17.51M1.03B-2%
Gain YTD-45.1724.609-980%
P/E Ratio25.9113.56191%
Revenue227M9.66B2%
Total Cash30.3M125M24%
Total Debt184M772M24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OSK: Fundamental Ratings
OSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYFMOSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FID18.560.06
+0.30%
First Trust S&P Int Div Aristocrats ETF
CAF13.00-0.02
-0.15%
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund
VCEB61.67-0.52
-0.83%
Vanguard ESG US Corporate Bond ETF
PAVE41.27-0.84
-1.99%
Global X US Infrastructure Dev ETF
NBDS30.11-0.67
-2.18%
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

HYFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYFM has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYFM jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYFM
1D Price
Change %
HYFM100%
+0.13%
ACA - HYFM
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
UGRO - HYFM
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
OSK - HYFM
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
TEX - HYFM
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
CNH - HYFM
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
More

OSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSK has been closely correlated with TEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OSK jumps, then TEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSK
1D Price
Change %
OSK100%
-3.86%
TEX - OSK
77%
Closely correlated
-5.52%
MTW - OSK
68%
Closely correlated
-6.72%
ASTE - OSK
67%
Closely correlated
-3.49%
CAT - OSK
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
ALG - OSK
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
More