HYLN
Price
$3.87
Change
-$0.26 (-6.30%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
686.56M
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$6.28
Change
-$0.30 (-4.56%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.86B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYLN vs QS

HYLN vs QS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYLN vs. QS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYLN is a Buy and QS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HYLN: $3.85 vs. QS: $6.58)
Brand notoriety: HYLN and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYLN: 44% vs. QS: 69%
Market capitalization -- HYLN: $686.56M vs. QS: $3.86B
HYLN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $686.56M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYLN is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYLN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYLN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HYLN is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

HYLN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.26% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

HYLN is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.12% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.86B) has a higher market cap than HYLN($687M). HYLN YTD gains are higher at: 109.239 vs. QS (-39.731). HYLN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -53.47M vs. QS (-347.9M). QS has more cash in the bank: 905M vs. HYLN (72.5M). HYLN has less debt than QS: HYLN (3.72M) vs QS (69.2M). HYLN has higher revenues than QS: HYLN (5.82M) vs QS (0).
HYLNQSHYLN / QS
Capitalization687M3.86B18%
EBITDA-53.47M-347.9M15%
Gain YTD109.239-39.731-275%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.82M0-
Total Cash72.5M905M8%
Total Debt3.72M69.2M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYLN vs QS: Fundamental Ratings
HYLN
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QS's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYLN (93). This means that QS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYLN’s over the last 12 months.

QS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HYLN (100). This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to HYLN’s over the last 12 months.

HYLN's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (99). This means that HYLN’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

HYLN's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as QS (63). This means that HYLN’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

HYLN's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QS (100). This means that HYLN’s stock grew significantly faster than QS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYLNQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFA99.40N/A
N/A
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
FDCF51.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
SNAG4.45N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF
PBJL31.33-0.10
-0.33%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jul
PDI16.41-0.14
-0.84%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-4.56%
SLDP - QS
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.88%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-10.39%
SES - QS
49%
Loosely correlated
-8.98%
AUR - QS
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.17%
INVZ - QS
46%
Loosely correlated
-7.85%
More