Ad is loading...
HYTLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
MARPS
Price
$4.04
Change
+$0.04 (+1.00%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:12 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

HYTLF vs MARPS

Header iconHYTLF vs MARPS Comparison
Open Charts HYTLF vs MARPSBanner chart's image
HYTERRA
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
Marine Petroleum Trust
Price$4.04
Change+$0.04 (+1.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
HYTLF vs MARPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYTLF vs. MARPS commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYTLF is a Hold and MARPS is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (HYTLF: $0.04 vs. MARPS: $4.00)
Brand notoriety: HYTLF and MARPS are both not notable
HYTLF represents the Oil & Gas Production, while MARPS is part of the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYTLF: 14% vs. MARPS: 25%
Market capitalization -- HYTLF: $8.22M vs. MARPS: $8.24M
HYTLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $8.22M. MARPS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $8.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HYTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the long-term than HYTLF.

Price Growth

HYTLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

MARPS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.85% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+4.97% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MARPS($8.24M) and HYTLF($8.22M) have the same market capitalization . MARPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 849K vs. HYTLF (-326.33K). MARPS has higher revenues than HYTLF: MARPS (1.13M) vs HYTLF (52).
HYTLFMARPSHYTLF / MARPS
Capitalization8.22M8.24M100%
EBITDA-326.33K849K-38%
Gain YTDN/A5.360-
P/E RatioN/A9.51-
Revenue521.13M0%
Total CashN/A994K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYTLF vs MARPS: Fundamental Ratings
HYTLF
MARPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3072
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
8915
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3671
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MARPS's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYTLF (66) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as HYTLF (100) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYTLF (89) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew significantly faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HYTLF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARPS (71) in the null industry. This means that HYTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYTLF (97) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSGFX12.350.25
+2.07%
Victory RS Select Growth C
CTYRX92.930.88
+0.96%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Adv
DODGX283.271.66
+0.59%
Dodge & Cox Stock I
MCGCX22.050.12
+0.55%
BlackRock Advantage Global Investor C
DAVPX37.910.13
+0.34%
Davenport Core Leaders Fund

HYTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYTLF has been loosely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYTLF jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYTLF
1D Price
Change %
HYTLF100%
N/A
TNK - HYTLF
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
DHT - HYTLF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
INSW - HYTLF
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
FRO - HYTLF
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
TK - HYTLF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
More

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and WMB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and WMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
+2.79%
WMB - MARPS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
HYTLF - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTM - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.53%
PBA - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
MPLX - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More