Advertisement
HYTLF vs MARPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYTLF is a Hold and MARPS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HYTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HYTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MARPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HYTLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HYTLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MARPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HYTLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +25.00% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +2.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +4.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.28%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+4.75% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.20% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| HYTLF | MARPS | HYTLF / MARPS | |
| Capitalization | 21.1M | 9.28M | 227% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 689K | - |
| Gain YTD | -57.143 | 25.984 | -220% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.70 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 998K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
HYTLF | MARPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 78 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MARPS's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HYTLF (43) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as HYTLF (100) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYTLF (93) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew significantly faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYTLF (95) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYTLF (97) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that MARPS’s stock grew significantly faster than HYTLF’s over the last 12 months.
| HYTLF | MARPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
HYTLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYTLF has been loosely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYTLF jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HYTLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYTLF | 100% | +15.38% | ||
| TNK - HYTLF | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| DHT - HYTLF | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| INSW - HYTLF | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| FRO - HYTLF | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| TK - HYTLF | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
MARPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and WMB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and WMB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARPS | 100% | +1.29% | ||
| WMB - MARPS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| HYTLF - MARPS | 24% Poorly correlated | +15.38% | ||
| DTM - MARPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| MPLX - MARPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| FLNG - MARPS | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
More | ||||