FLNG
Price
$31.24
Change
-$0.08 (-0.26%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MARPS
Price
$4.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
9.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLNG vs MARPS

FLNG vs MARPS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLNG vs. MARPS commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNG is a Hold and MARPS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLNG vs MARPS: Fundamental Ratings
FLNG
MARPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9095
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1086
SMR RATING
1..100
5917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4271
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2632
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLNG's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (8). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MARPS (86). This means that FLNG’s stock grew significantly faster than MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLNG (59). This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (71). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (32). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLNGMARPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FLNG: $31.24 vs. MARPS: $4.19)
Brand notoriety: FLNG and MARPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLNG: 72% vs. MARPS: 167%
Market capitalization -- FLNG: $1.67B vs. MARPS: $9.04M
FLNG [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.67B. MARPS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $9.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $32.88K to $104.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $16.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while MARPS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MARPS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLNG is a better buy in the long-term than MARPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MARPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLNG is a better buy in the short-term than MARPS.

Price Growth

FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.30% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FLNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MARPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASML1867.3158.82
+3.25%
ASML Holding NV
POWL196.105.50
+2.89%
Powell Industries Inc.
SCL63.001.47
+2.39%
Stepan Co
IMMP4.35-0.19
-4.19%
Immutep Limited
IPSC1.53-0.08
-4.97%
Century Therapeutics

FLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLNG has been loosely correlated with NVGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLNG jumps, then NVGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLNG
1D Price
Change %
FLNG100%
-0.26%
NVGS - FLNG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
NAT - FLNG
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
TK - FLNG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
TNK - FLNG
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
BWLP - FLNG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARPS has been loosely correlated with TMDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MARPS jumps, then TMDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
N/A
TMDE - MARPS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
DTM - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
PAGP - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
PBT - MARPS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FLNG - MARPS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More