Advertisement
HZO vs SAH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MarineMax (HZO) vs. Sonic Automotive (SAH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MarineMax (HZO) is the world's largest recreational boat and yacht retailer, navigating a soft marine retail environment through strategic diversification into higher-margin businesses such as marina operations, superyacht services, and finance & insurance (F&I).
- Sonic Automotive (SAH), one of the nation's largest automotive retailers, delivered all-time record annual revenues of $15.2 billion in fiscal 2025, driven by strength across its Franchised Dealerships, EchoPark, and Powersports segments.
- HZO posted a fiscal 2025 net loss amid industry headwinds but achieved expanding gross margins (34.7% in Q4) thanks to its non-boat revenue streams, which now account for over 26% of total revenue.
- SAH generated record annual gross profit of $2.4 billion and grew adjusted earnings per share (EPS) by 18% year-over-year, while returning capital to shareholders through dividends and $82.4 million in share repurchases.
- Both companies face macroeconomic pressures from elevated interest rates and tariff uncertainty, but SAH currently demonstrates stronger earnings momentum, while HZO is positioned for a potential cyclical recovery as marine market conditions stabilize.
- From a market capitalization and scale perspective, SAH (approximately $3.25 billion) operates at roughly four times the size of HZO (approximately $800 million), reflecting the vast difference in their addressable markets.
Introduction
Investors seeking exposure to consumer discretionary retail often look beyond traditional big-box names and into specialized vehicle markets — both on land and on water. HZO (MarineMax, Inc.) and SAH (Sonic Automotive, Inc.) represent two distinct but thematically related corners of the retail landscape: recreational boating and automotive dealerships, respectively. Both companies are leaders in their industries, both are navigating an environment shaped by elevated interest rates, evolving trade policies, and shifting consumer sentiment, and both have pursued diversification strategies aimed at smoothing cyclical earnings. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up across key dimensions, including recent performance, business model resilience, growth catalysts, and the perspective an AI-driven analytical framework might offer.
HZO Overview and Recent Performance
HZO, MarineMax, Inc., is headquartered in Oldsmar, Florida, and operates as the world's largest recreational boat and yacht retailer, with an expanding footprint in marina operations and superyacht services. The company sells new and used boats across premium brands, offers parts, accessories, maintenance, storage, brokerage, and charter services, and has broadened its portfolio through more than 20 acquisitions since 2019.
In its most recent fiscal year ended September 30, 2025, MarineMax generated $2.3 billion in revenue, with same-store sales declining 2.1% compared to the prior year. The company reported a net loss of $31.6 million, though adjusted EPS (earnings per share) came in at $0.61 and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached $109.8 million. A key bright spot has been margin expansion: gross margins improved to 34.7% in the fourth quarter, driven by the growing contribution of higher-margin businesses such as F&I (finance & insurance), parts and services, superyacht services, and marina operations. Non-boat revenue now accounts for approximately 26% of total sales, up from 15% in fiscal 2019.
In recent weeks, the stock has traded in the mid-$30s, reflecting a year-to-date gain of roughly 50% and demonstrating significant recovery from its 52-week low near $21. The company's fiscal 2026 guidance projects adjusted EBITDA of $110 million to $125 million and adjusted EPS of $0.40 to $0.95, reflecting a measured outlook given persistent macroeconomic uncertainty. Management has also rationalized its store portfolio and eliminated underperforming brands to concentrate on higher-value offerings. Analysts remain cautiously constructive, with a consensus "Buy" rating and an average price target near $38.
SAH Overview and Recent Performance
SAH, Sonic Automotive, Inc., based in Charlotte, North Carolina, is one of the largest automotive retailers in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Franchised Dealerships (new and used vehicle sales, fixed operations, and F&I), EchoPark (pre-owned vehicle specialty retail), and Powersports (motorcycles, personal watercraft, and all-terrain vehicles). With over 100 dealership locations nationwide, Sonic represents a broad range of automotive brands and has strategically grown its luxury portfolio — notably becoming the largest Jaguar Land Rover volume retailer in the U.S. following acquisitions in California.
For the full year 2025, Sonic Automotive posted all-time record revenues of $15.2 billion, a 7% increase year-over-year, alongside record annual gross profit of $2.4 billion. Adjusted net income rose 17% to $229.2 million, with adjusted diluted EPS reaching $6.60 — an 18% improvement. The EchoPark segment, which had previously been a drag on results, delivered an inflection point with record annual adjusted EBITDA of $49.2 million (up 78% year-over-year), and the Powersports segment also set records with adjusted EBITDA of $11.5 million. The Franchised Dealerships segment continues to anchor the business, with parts, service, and collision repair (fixed operations) and F&I together contributing roughly 75% of total gross profit — a sign of durable, recurring cash flow generation.
The stock has recently traded near the $100 mark, with a robust year-to-date gain exceeding 60%. Sonic returned significant capital to shareholders in 2025, repurchasing approximately 1.3 million shares for $82.4 million and maintaining a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Available liquidity stood at over $700 million as of year-end. Citigroup upgraded SAH from Neutral to Buy in November 2025, reflecting improving sentiment toward the company's operational execution and diversified business model.
Trending AI Robots
For traders and investors looking to supplement their own research with data-driven insights, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots employ proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) — machine learning frameworks trained on price action, volume patterns, technical indicators, and market sentiment — to generate trading signals across a range of timeframes from 5-minute to 60-minute cycles. Performance varies widely by strategy: some bots have recorded annualized returns above 100%, with certain strategies posting win rates exceeding 80% and profit factors above 4.0 during favorable market regimes. Each bot operates with its own distinct trading style, risk parameters, and universe of tickers. To explore which AI strategies are currently top-ranked, visit the Trending AI Robots page and review the latest performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both HZO and SAH operate in consumer discretionary vehicle retail, their comparative profiles reveal meaningful contrasts across several dimensions.
Scale and Revenue Base: SAH operates on an entirely different scale, with annual revenues exceeding $15 billion versus HZO's $2.3 billion. Sonic's market capitalization of approximately $3.25 billion is roughly four times that of MarineMax. This difference reflects the vastly larger addressable market for automotive retail compared to recreational boating.
Profitability and Earnings Trajectory: SAH is solidly profitable on both a reported and adjusted basis, generating $229 million in adjusted net income in fiscal 2025. HZO, by contrast, posted a net loss for the year — though its adjusted results showed modest profitability. SAH's adjusted P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio near 31 compares favorably to HZO's elevated trailing P/E, reflecting SAH's stronger current earnings power.
Margin Profile: MarineMax's gross margins (34.7% in Q4) are structurally higher than Sonic's (roughly 15.7% on a consolidated basis), reflecting the higher price points and luxury nature of the boating market. However, Sonic's fixed operations and F&I segments — which contribute recurring, high-margin revenue — give it a more resilient earnings base through economic cycles.
Shareholder Returns: SAH pays a regular quarterly dividend (yielding roughly 1.6%) and actively repurchases shares. HZO does not currently pay a dividend, reinvesting instead into strategic acquisitions and business diversification.
Risk Factors and Sentiment: Both stocks are sensitive to interest rate policy and consumer confidence. MarineMax faces a particularly challenging backdrop in new boat sales, where elevated rates have caused many buyers to defer purchases. Sonic contends with tariff-related uncertainty affecting new vehicle pricing and inventory levels, as well as affordability pressures in the used-vehicle market. That said, SAH's record-setting operational performance in 2025 and EchoPark's turnaround have bolstered market sentiment, while HZO's cautious fiscal 2026 guidance has tempered near-term enthusiasm despite long-term strategic promise.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors — including earnings momentum, revenue diversification, profitability consistency, and market sentiment — Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for SAH over HZO in the current environment. Sonic Automotive's record revenue and gross profit trajectory, its successful EchoPark turnaround, and its combination of dividend income and share buybacks present a profile of operational strength and capital discipline that AI models tend to favor when assessing trend consistency and stability. MarineMax's story is more turnaround-oriented: the company's margin expansion and diversification efforts represent genuine strategic progress, but the AI would likely weigh the still-weak new boat sales environment, the recent net loss, and the cautious forward guidance as factors warranting a more probabilistic, wait-and-see approach. Should the marine retail cycle show clearer signs of stabilization — as suggested by the company's strong Fort Lauderdale Boat Show results — the AI's relative preference could shift accordingly. As always, these signals reflect probabilistic pattern analysis rather than deterministic forecasts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HZO is a Hold and SAH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HZO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HZO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SAH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HZO’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HZO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 9 bearish.
- SAH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HZO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while SAH (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -8.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
HZO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
SAH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+0.78% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.31% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| HZO | SAH | HZO / SAH | |
| Capitalization | 759M | 2.9B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 118M | 666M | 18% |
| Gain YTD | 42.262 | 49.702 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 215.44 | 14.58 | 1,477% |
| Revenue | 2.2B | 15.5B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 175M | 19.2M | 911% |
| Total Debt | 1.11B | 4.67B | 24% |
HZO | SAH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAH's Valuation (12) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (61). This means that SAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.
SAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for HZO (100). This means that SAH’s stock grew significantly faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.
SAH's SMR Rating (45) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (91). This means that SAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.
SAH's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as HZO (42). This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to HZO’s over the last 12 months.
HZO's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SAH (62). This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to SAH’s over the last 12 months.
| HZO | SAH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TBCIX | 208.24 | 3.16 | +1.54% |
| T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth I | |||
| SCJKX | 7.95 | 0.04 | +0.51% |
| Steward Covered Call Income R6 | |||
| CSHAX | 12.86 | 0.06 | +0.49% |
| NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class A | |||
| CMNWX | 89.51 | 0.38 | +0.43% |
| Principal Capital Appreciation A | |||
| SGISX | 42.06 | 0.11 | +0.26% |
| Steward Global Equity Income Fund I | |||
HZO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HZO has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HZO jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
SAH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAH has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAH jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.