Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBOT vs SMH
IBOT vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IBOT vs SMH
IBOT vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBOT vs. SMH commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBOT is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 69.3B vs. IBOT (99M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IBOT: SMH (57.868) vs IBOT (21.176). IBOT was incepted earlier than SMH: IBOT (3 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IBOT (0.47). IBOT has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| IBOT | SMH | IBOT / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 21.176 | 57.868 | 37% |
| Net Assets | 99M | 69.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 12.00 | 208% |
| Yield | 0.31 | 0.20 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IBOT | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 20 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBOT has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBOT jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBOT | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| ASML - IBOT | 81% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| LRCX - IBOT | 81% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AMAT - IBOT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| KLAC - IBOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| NVMI - IBOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||