IBP
Price
$245.98
Change
+$3.03 (+1.25%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.46B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMHC
Price
$72.45
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.67B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBP vs TMHC

IBP vs TMHC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Installed Building Products (IBP) vs. Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Installed Building Products (IBP) operates as an installer of insulation and complementary building products, while Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is a national homebuilder and land developer, giving each distinct exposure to the U.S. housing market.
  • IBP has demonstrated margin resilience through commercial segment growth, even as residential same-branch sales faced headwinds from elevated interest rates and affordability challenges.
  • TMHC delivered nearly 13,000 home closings in 2025 with an adjusted gross margin of 23.0%, supported by a diversified consumer strategy spanning entry-level, move-up, and resort lifestyle segments.
  • In a landmark development, TMHC was acquired by Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) and delisted from the NYSE in late July 2026, fundamentally altering its investment thesis relative to the independently traded IBP.
  • Valuation profiles diverge sharply: IBP trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple reflecting its growth-by-acquisition model and margin expansion story, while TMHC historically traded at a low single-digit P/E ratio, reflecting the market's cyclical caution toward homebuilders.

Introduction

Investors tracking the U.S. housing and construction ecosystem frequently encounter two names that, while both tied to residential real estate, represent fundamentally different business models. Installed Building Products (IBP) is a leading installer of insulation and complementary building products, serving homebuilders and commercial contractors across the country. Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC), by contrast, is a top-ten U.S. homebuilder that designs, constructs, and sells single-family and multi-family homes directly to consumers. This stock comparison examines how these two companies have navigated the recent market environment characterized by elevated mortgage rates, persistent affordability constraints, and shifting demand patterns — offering traders and long-term investors a nuanced look at two distinct plays on American housing.

IBP Overview and Recent Performance

Installed Building Products (IBP), headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, is the second-largest insulation installer in the United States, with a national network of branch locations. The company also installs garage doors, rain gutters, shower doors, closet shelving, and mirrors, and operates manufacturing and distribution segments that provide cellulose insulation and specialty products. For the full year 2025, IBP reported record net revenue of $3.0 billion, a 1.0% increase year-over-year, and record net income of $265.4 million, or $9.71 per diluted share. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached a record $518.5 million, representing an adjusted EBITDA margin of 17.5%.

In recent months, IBP has navigated a challenging residential backdrop with notable discipline. Residential same-branch sales declined 4.4% for the full year 2025, reflecting the broader affordability squeeze impacting homebuyers. However, commercial same-branch sales surged 10.4%, highlighting the benefit of IBP's end-market diversification. The company's Other segment — which includes manufacturing and distribution — grew revenue by 22.8% in the fourth quarter of 2025, further cushioning residential softness. Management also demonstrated a strong commitment to shareholder returns, declaring a regular quarterly dividend increase to $0.39 per share, an annual variable dividend of $1.80 per share, and authorizing a new $500 million stock repurchase program. Fitch Ratings assigned IBP a first-time Long-Term Issuer Default Rating of BB+ with a Stable Outlook, and the company closed a $500 million senior notes offering to strengthen its balance sheet. The stock has experienced heightened volatility in 2026, trading in a 52-week range of approximately $193 to $349, reflecting broader macroeconomic uncertainty and sector rotation.

TMHC Overview and Recent Performance

Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC), based in Scottsdale, Arizona, is one of the largest publicly traded homebuilders in the United States, operating under the Taylor Morrison, Esplanade, and Yardly brands. The company serves a broad spectrum of buyers — from entry-level to move-up to active adult and resort lifestyle — across Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Texas, and other key markets. For full-year 2025, TMHC delivered 12,997 home closings at an average sales price of $597,000, generating home closings revenue of $7.76 billion. Full-year reported net income was $783 million, or $7.77 per diluted share, with an adjusted home closings gross margin of 23.0%. The company achieved 40 basis points of SG&A (selling, general, and administrative) expense leverage year-over-year and repurchased 6.5 million shares for $381 million.

Throughout recent quarters, TMHC demonstrated the resilience of its diversified consumer and geographic portfolio. While net sales orders moderated from near-record levels seen in prior periods, the company's monthly absorption pace remained solidly ahead of pre-pandemic historical averages, supported by strength in the resort lifestyle segment, particularly in Florida. Management emphasized a community-specific pace-versus-price strategy, maintaining discipline on margins even as affordability headwinds persisted. The company ended 2025 with total liquidity of $1.8 billion and a net homebuilding debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 20.5%, reflecting a conservatively managed balance sheet. In a transformative development, TMHC was acquired by Berkshire Hathaway and delisted from the NYSE in late July 2026, effectively concluding its journey as an independently traded public company and cementing a premium exit for long-term shareholders.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where housing-related stocks face crosscurrents from interest rate policy, inflation data, and shifting consumer confidence, AI-driven trading tools have become an increasingly valuable resource for identifying timely opportunities. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from a universe of hundreds of available virtual agents — each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker coverage. These bots, powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs), have delivered annualized returns ranging from double-digit percentages to over 100% in certain strategies, with some agents posting win rates above 65% and profit factors exceeding 2.0. Bots vary widely: some focus on large-cap momentum, others on small-cap value or sector-specific themes such as homebuilders, industrials, and real estate. Only the bots best suited to prevailing market conditions earn a spot in the Trending section. Explore the full lineup at Trending AI Robots to discover which strategies are currently in favor.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both IBP and TMHC operate within the U.S. housing ecosystem, their business models place them at different points in the value chain — and expose them to different risk and reward profiles. TMHC, as a homebuilder and land developer, carries direct exposure to the cyclicality of homebuyer demand, land costs, and mortgage rate sensitivity. Its revenue base is far larger — $8.12 billion in 2025 versus IBP's $3.0 billion — but its gross margins are structurally lower, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of home construction. IBP, as an installer and distributor, benefits from a more asset-light model and derives revenue from both residential and commercial end markets, providing a natural hedge when housing starts decelerate.

On valuation, the contrast has been stark. TMHC historically traded at a P/E ratio in the 7–10 range, consistent with the market's tendency to discount homebuilder earnings due to cyclical risk. IBP has commanded a P/E in the mid-20s, reflecting its acquisition-driven growth strategy, expanding margins, and the stability provided by its commercial and manufacturing operations. From a momentum perspective, TMHC had been a notable outperformer in 2026, rising over 23% year-to-date through late July before its acquisition, while IBP declined roughly 11% over the same period amid sector-wide rotation. The acquisition of TMHC by Berkshire Hathaway represents a decisive resolution for that stock, while IBP remains an independent entity with an active growth runway, ongoing M&A (mergers and acquisitions) strategy, and a demonstrated ability to return capital to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor Installed Building Products (IBP) for ongoing trading opportunity in the current environment. The reasoning is multifaceted: IBP remains an independently traded, liquid stock with a clear growth narrative supported by commercial segment expansion, accretive acquisitions, margin improvement, and aggressive capital return programs. With TMHC now delisted following its acquisition by Berkshire Hathaway, its investment thesis has reached a definitive conclusion, removing it from the active trading universe. For IBP, the combination of residential headwinds and commercial tailwinds creates a nuanced setup where AI models can potentially identify mispriced entry and exit points based on technical signals and fundamental catalysts. A probabilistic AI framework would recognize that IBP's diversified revenue streams, strong balance sheet, and shareholder-friendly policies provide multiple levers for value creation, though the trajectory of interest rates and housing affordability will remain decisive variables for near-term price action.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IBP vs. TMHC commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBP is a Buy and TMHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (IBP: $242.95 vs. TMHC: $72.45)
Brand notoriety: IBP and TMHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBP: 109% vs. TMHC: 174%
Market capitalization -- IBP: $6.46B vs. TMHC: $6.67B
IBP [@Homebuilding] is valued at $6.46B. TMHC’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $6.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $40.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMHC is a better buy in the long-term than IBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TMHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IBP is a better buy in the short-term than TMHC.

Price Growth

IBP (@Homebuilding) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while TMHC (@Homebuilding) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

TMHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+1.93% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMHC($6.67B) and IBP($6.46B) have the same market capitalization . IBP has higher P/E ratio than TMHC: IBP (26.21) vs TMHC (10.80). TMHC YTD gains are higher at: 23.068 vs. IBP (-5.400). TMHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. IBP (524M). TMHC has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. IBP (90.4M). IBP has less debt than TMHC: IBP (1.18B) vs TMHC (2.42B). TMHC has higher revenues than IBP: TMHC (7.61B) vs IBP (2.95B).
IBPTMHCIBP / TMHC
Capitalization6.46B6.67B97%
EBITDA524M1.03B51%
Gain YTD-5.40023.068-23%
P/E Ratio26.2110.80243%
Revenue2.95B7.61B39%
Total Cash90.4M653M14%
Total Debt1.18B2.42B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBP vs TMHC: Fundamental Ratings
IBP
TMHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3348
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5118
SMR RATING
1..100
2669
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6217
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMHC's Valuation (42) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as IBP (61) in the Building Products industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew similarly to IBP’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBP (51) in the Building Products industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBP’s over the last 12 months.

IBP's SMR Rating (26) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMHC (69) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that IBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as IBP (50) in the Building Products industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew similarly to IBP’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBP (62) in the Building Products industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBPTMHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTRE42.34N/A
N/A
First Trust Alerian Dsrupt Tech RE ETF
LCF46.38-0.20
-0.43%
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
CHR.X0.013385-0.000248
-1.82%
Chromia cryptocurrency
FLOKI.X0.000020N/A
-1.95%
FLOKI cryptocurrency
MASK.X0.348984-0.009962
-2.78%
Mask Network cryptocurrency

IBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBP has been closely correlated with TMHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBP jumps, then TMHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBP
1D Price
Change %
IBP100%
-2.65%
TMHC - IBP
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
GRBK - IBP
69%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
TOL - IBP
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
PHM - IBP
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
LEN - IBP
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
More