ICE
Price
$161.26
Change
-$3.33 (-2.02%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
90.53B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NDAQ
Price
$96.88
Change
-$1.83 (-1.85%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
54.15B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs NDAQ

ICE vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and NDAQ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2026
Stock price -- (ICE: $161.26 vs. NDAQ: $96.88)
Brand notoriety: ICE and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 82% vs. NDAQ: 61%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $90.53B vs. NDAQ: $54.15B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $90.53B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $54.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $130.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $44.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICE is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.48% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($90.5B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($54.2B). NDAQ has higher P/E ratio than ICE: NDAQ (28.24) vs ICE (22.74). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 0.417 vs. ICE (0.260). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.68B vs. NDAQ (3.43B). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 2.79B vs. ICE (2.62B). NDAQ has less debt than ICE: NDAQ (9.24B) vs ICE (20.5B). ICE has higher revenues than NDAQ: ICE (13.4B) vs NDAQ (8.74B).
ICENDAQICE / NDAQ
Capitalization90.5B54.2B167%
EBITDA7.68B3.43B224%
Gain YTD0.2600.41762%
P/E Ratio22.7428.2481%
Revenue13.4B8.74B153%
Total Cash2.62B2.79B94%
Total Debt20.5B9.24B222%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5729
SMR RATING
1..100
6053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8272
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (69). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (57). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's SMR Rating (53) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (60). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (48). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (82). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICENDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NDAQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRT280.5311.70
+4.35%
Vertiv Holdings Co
EXP194.480.90
+0.46%
Eagle Materials
AENT5.13-0.01
-0.19%
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corp
FTHM0.68N/A
-0.47%
Fathom Holdings
VTOL43.32-0.38
-0.87%
Bristow Group