| ICF | PGZ | ICF / PGZ | |
| Gain YTD | 18.982 | 10.056 | 189% |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 74.6M | 2,854% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 2.62 | 12% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 25.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 2.46 | 6.47 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| ICF | PGZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICF has been closely correlated with PLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICF jumps, then PLD could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZ and DLR have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZ and DLR's prices will move in lockstep.