IDCBF
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
344.3B
MUFG
Price
$15.29
Change
-$0.11 (-0.71%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
174.49B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDCBF vs MUFG

Header iconIDCBF vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts IDCBF vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$0.75
Change-$0.04 (-5.06%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization344.3B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.29
Change-$0.11 (-0.71%)
Volume$2.75M
Capitalization174.49B
IDCBF vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IDCBF vs. MUFG commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDCBF is a Hold and MUFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (IDCBF: $0.75 vs. MUFG: $15.29)
Brand notoriety: IDCBF and MUFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IDCBF: 25% vs. MUFG: 77%
Market capitalization -- IDCBF: $344.3B vs. MUFG: $174.49B
IDCBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $344.3B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $174.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $828.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IDCBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IDCBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than IDCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IDCBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IDCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBF.

Price Growth

IDCBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -6.54% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was -1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBF($344B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($174B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than IDCBF: MUFG (14.12) vs IDCBF (5.53). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 30.461 vs. IDCBF (20.115). IDCBF has less debt than MUFG: IDCBF (3.04T) vs MUFG (46.25T). MUFG has higher revenues than IDCBF: MUFG (6.72T) vs IDCBF (810B).
IDCBFMUFGIDCBF / MUFG
Capitalization344B174B198%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.11530.46166%
P/E Ratio5.5314.1239%
Revenue810B6.72T12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.04T46.25T7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IDCBF vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
IDCBF
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6511
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2331
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MUFG (87) in the Major Banks industry. This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IDCBF (65) in the null industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IDCBF (1) in the null industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IDCBF (56) in the null industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to IDCBF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MUFG (31) in the Major Banks industry. This means that IDCBF’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDCBFMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVD10.170.64
+6.72%
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
CNXT39.281.14
+2.99%
VanEck ChiNext ETF
IWS138.59-0.04
-0.03%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
RMNY23.72-0.01
-0.03%
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
VPLS78.06-0.06
-0.08%
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF

IDCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDCBF and BCS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDCBF and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBF
1D Price
Change %
IDCBF100%
N/A
BCS - IDCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
SMFG - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
INGVF - IDCBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MUFG - IDCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
NAUBF - IDCBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More