IDNA
Price
$32.65
Change
-$0.47 (-1.42%)
Updated
Jul 16, 04:56 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
193.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XBI
Price
$152.00
Change
-$4.22 (-2.70%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Net Assets
10.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IDNA vs XBI

IDNA vs XBI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 10, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) vs. SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI)

Key Takeaways

  • IDNA offers concentrated thematic exposure to genomics, immunology, and bioengineering companies globally, while XBI provides broad, equal-weighted exposure to U.S. biotechnology firms.
  • IDNA holds approximately 50 securities with top holdings often exceeding 4-5% each; XBI maintains around 150-160 holdings in a more diversified equal-weighted structure.
  • IDNA carries a higher expense ratio of 0.47% compared to XBI’s 0.35%, reflecting its specialized thematic mandate versus XBI’s broader sector index approach.
  • Both ETFs focus exclusively on the healthcare sector, but IDNA emphasizes innovation in genomics and immunology, whereas XBI captures the full spectrum of U.S. biotech companies regardless of market capitalization.
  • IDNA’s global reach includes developed and emerging market issuers; XBI remains U.S.-centric and equal-weighted, reducing concentration risk in large-cap names.
  • Structural differences position IDNA for investors seeking targeted innovation themes and XBI for those preferring diversified biotech sector participation with lower costs.

Introduction

Investors seeking healthcare sector exposure often compare thematic and broad biotechnology exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) and the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) both target innovative healthcare companies yet employ distinct strategies. IDNA focuses on a narrow set of genomics, immunology, and bioengineering themes across global markets, while XBI delivers equal-weighted exposure to a wide array of U.S. biotechnology firms. These ETFs serve investors with overlapping yet differentiated goals within the same overarching sector, allowing comparison of concentration, cost, and geographic scope in a single article.

iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) Overview

The iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index. The fund holds approximately 50 securities, with the top ten positions typically accounting for over 40% of assets. Representative top holdings include Moderna Inc., Bayer AG, and Exelixis Inc. Allocations concentrate in the healthcare sector at 100%. IDNA applies an expense ratio of 0.47% and follows a rules-based methodology that selects companies benefiting from long-term growth in genomics, immunology, and bioengineering. The ETF includes developed and emerging market issuers, providing geographic diversification within its narrow thematic mandate.

SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) Overview

The SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. The fund maintains approximately 150-160 holdings through an equal-weighted methodology that limits individual position sizes. Top holdings typically represent about 1.3-1.6% each, including names such as Moderna Inc., Apogee Therapeutics Inc., and Kymera Therapeutics Inc. The portfolio remains almost entirely within the healthcare sector. XBI features an expense ratio of 0.35% and rebalances periodically to maintain equal weights across U.S. biotechnology companies of varying market capitalizations.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The biotechnology and genomics segments operate within the broader healthcare sector, influenced by ongoing innovation in gene editing, immunotherapy, and personalized medicine. Capital flows into these areas respond to clinical trial outcomes, regulatory approvals from bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations that affect growth-oriented companies. Sector risks include high research and development costs, binary clinical results, and potential policy changes around drug pricing. Recent market cycles have highlighted rotation toward or away from smaller biotechnology firms depending on risk appetite and capital availability.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, IDNA’s concentrated thematic approach has produced distinct volatility patterns tied to developments in genomics and immunology pipelines. XBI’s equal-weighted construction has delivered smoother relative performance during periods of sector rotation, as smaller-capitalization holdings contribute more evenly than in market-cap-weighted alternatives. Both ETFs respond to earnings cycles of key holdings and shifts in interest rate expectations, yet XBI’s broader diversification and lower expense ratio support more consistent positioning across biotech market cycles. Investors evaluating relative positioning note IDNA’s higher concentration risk alongside potential for outsized gains from successful innovation themes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The ETF’s lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 150 holdings, and equal-weighted methodology provide greater cost efficiency and reduced single-name risk compared with IDNA’s more concentrated thematic profile. While IDNA offers targeted exposure to genomics and immunology innovation, XBI’s positioning supports more consistent participation across biotech cycles with lower structural costs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IDNA vs. XBI commentary
Jul 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IDNA is a Hold and XBI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XBI has more net assets: 10.6B vs. IDNA (194M). IDNA has a higher annual dividend yield than XBI: IDNA (26.995) vs XBI (24.784). IDNA was incepted earlier than XBI: IDNA (7 years) vs XBI (20 years). XBI (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IDNA (0.47). IDNA has a higher turnover XBI (43.00) vs XBI (43.00).
IDNAXBIIDNA / XBI
Gain YTD26.99524.784109%
Net Assets194M10.6B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.470.35134%
Turnover49.0043.00114%
Yield0.830.36231%
Fund Existence7 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IDNAXBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IDNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XBI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXD39.650.12
+0.30%
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF
ALBG6.50N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF
SCYB26.10-0.02
-0.08%
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
BTCI29.03-0.20
-0.68%
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
NUEM40.13-0.98
-2.37%
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF

IDNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDNA has been loosely correlated with PRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDNA jumps, then PRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDNA
1D Price
Change %
IDNA100%
+0.91%
PRME - IDNA
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
FATE - IDNA
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCUS - IDNA
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
SANA - IDNA
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
BNGO - IDNA
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
More