Investors seeking healthcare sector exposure often compare thematic and broad biotechnology exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) and the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) both target innovative healthcare companies yet employ distinct strategies. IDNA focuses on a narrow set of genomics, immunology, and bioengineering themes across global markets, while XBI delivers equal-weighted exposure to a wide array of U.S. biotechnology firms. These ETFs serve investors with overlapping yet differentiated goals within the same overarching sector, allowing comparison of concentration, cost, and geographic scope in a single article.
The iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index. The fund holds approximately 50 securities, with the top ten positions typically accounting for over 40% of assets. Representative top holdings include Moderna Inc., Bayer AG, and Exelixis Inc. Allocations concentrate in the healthcare sector at 100%. IDNA applies an expense ratio of 0.47% and follows a rules-based methodology that selects companies benefiting from long-term growth in genomics, immunology, and bioengineering. The ETF includes developed and emerging market issuers, providing geographic diversification within its narrow thematic mandate.
The SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. The fund maintains approximately 150-160 holdings through an equal-weighted methodology that limits individual position sizes. Top holdings typically represent about 1.3-1.6% each, including names such as Moderna Inc., Apogee Therapeutics Inc., and Kymera Therapeutics Inc. The portfolio remains almost entirely within the healthcare sector. XBI features an expense ratio of 0.35% and rebalances periodically to maintain equal weights across U.S. biotechnology companies of varying market capitalizations.
The biotechnology and genomics segments operate within the broader healthcare sector, influenced by ongoing innovation in gene editing, immunotherapy, and personalized medicine. Capital flows into these areas respond to clinical trial outcomes, regulatory approvals from bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations that affect growth-oriented companies. Sector risks include high research and development costs, binary clinical results, and potential policy changes around drug pricing. Recent market cycles have highlighted rotation toward or away from smaller biotechnology firms depending on risk appetite and capital availability.
In recent weeks and months, IDNA’s concentrated thematic approach has produced distinct volatility patterns tied to developments in genomics and immunology pipelines. XBI’s equal-weighted construction has delivered smoother relative performance during periods of sector rotation, as smaller-capitalization holdings contribute more evenly than in market-cap-weighted alternatives. Both ETFs respond to earnings cycles of key holdings and shifts in interest rate expectations, yet XBI’s broader diversification and lower expense ratio support more consistent positioning across biotech market cycles. Investors evaluating relative positioning note IDNA’s higher concentration risk alongside potential for outsized gains from successful innovation themes.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The ETF’s lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 150 holdings, and equal-weighted methodology provide greater cost efficiency and reduced single-name risk compared with IDNA’s more concentrated thematic profile. While IDNA offers targeted exposure to genomics and immunology innovation, XBI’s positioning supports more consistent participation across biotech cycles with lower structural costs.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IDNA | XBI | IDNA / XBI | |
| Gain YTD | 26.995 | 24.784 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 194M | 10.6B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 43.00 | 114% |
| Yield | 0.83 | 0.36 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| IDNA | XBI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STXD | 39.65 | 0.12 | +0.30% |
| Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| ALBG | 6.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF | |||
| SCYB | 26.10 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| BTCI | 29.03 | -0.20 | -0.68% |
| NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | |||
| NUEM | 40.13 | -0.98 | -2.37% |
| Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDNA has been loosely correlated with PRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IDNA jumps, then PRME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IDNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDNA | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| PRME - IDNA | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| FATE - IDNA | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RCUS - IDNA | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SANA - IDNA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| BNGO - IDNA | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.48% | ||
More | ||||