IEFA
Price
$96.17
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Net Assets
182.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IXUS
Price
$94.18
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Net Assets
56.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEFA vs IXUS

Header iconIEFA vs IXUS Comparison
Open Charts IEFA vs IXUSBanner chart's image
IEFA vs IXUS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) vs. iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs share an identical 0.07% expense ratio and passive indexing strategy, offering low-cost international diversification excluding U.S. stocks.
  • IEFA focuses on developed markets outside U.S. and Canada (MSCI EAFE IMI Index, ~2,600 holdings), while IXUS provides broader exposure including emerging markets (MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index, ~4,200 holdings).
  • IEFA emphasizes financials (22%) and industrials (20%), with top holdings like ASML and AstraZeneca; IXUS boosts tech (16%) via Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung, alongside similar financial weighting.
  • IEFA offers superior liquidity with ~$171B AUM and 20M+ avg daily volume versus IXUS's ~$53B AUM and 3M+ volume; both maintain tight 0.01% bid/ask spreads.
  • IXUS introduces higher volatility from emerging markets (~25% allocation), potentially enhancing returns in growth cycles but increasing risk versus IEFA's developed-market stability.
  • Structural overlap (~75% shared exposure) makes them complementary for fine-tuning between pure developed stability and total ex-US breadth.

Introduction

IEFA and IXUS stand out as premier low-cost options for U.S. investors seeking international equity exposure amid ongoing sector rotation away from U.S. tech dominance. Both passively track MSCI indexes excluding U.S. stocks, but IEFA targets developed markets outside North America for stability, while IXUS encompasses emerging markets for broader growth potential. This ETF comparison highlights their structural nuances in a market environment favoring global diversification, where weakening U.S. dollar trends and attractive international valuations draw capital flows. Investors often weigh IEFA for conservative positioning versus IXUS for comprehensive ex-U.S. coverage targeting similar long-term goals of risk mitigation and return enhancement through non-U.S. assets.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index, delivering exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap equities in developed markets across Europe, Australasia, and the Far East, explicitly excluding the U.S. and Canada. With approximately 2,631 holdings, it emphasizes broad diversification in stable economies like Japan, the UK, France, and Switzerland.

Top holdings include ASML Holding NV (2.21%), AstraZeneca PLC (1.23%), Novartis AG (1.21%), Roche PS Par AG (1.19%), and HSBC Holdings PLC (1.13%). Sector allocations tilt toward financials (22.41%), industrials (20.27%), health care (10.10%), consumer discretionary (9.06%), and information technology (8.83%).

Its 0.07% expense ratio supports cost efficiency in a passive structure with semi-annual distributions. IEFA boasts exceptional liquidity, managing $171 billion in AUM, a 0.01% 30-day median bid/ask spread, and over 20 million shares in average daily volume, making it ideal for institutional and retail scale.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) Overview

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) follows the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index, capturing large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from both developed and emerging markets outside the U.S. This results in 4,172 holdings for extensive global reach, including Canada and key emerging economies.

Leading positions feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (3.58%), Samsung Electronics Ltd (1.53%), ASML Holding NV (1.32%), Tencent Holdings Ltd (1.11%), and SK Hynix Inc (0.88%). Sectors prioritize financials (22.33%), information technology (15.68%), industrials (15.62%), consumer discretionary (8.94%), and materials (7.97%).

Matching IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio, it employs a passive approach with semi-annual payouts. Liquidity remains strong at $53 billion AUM, 0.01% bid/ask spread, and 3.3 million average daily shares, though trailing IEFA in scale.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

International equities navigate a dynamic macro landscape marked by U.S. dollar softening, easing monetary policies in developed markets, and resilient growth in emerging economies. Developed markets benefit from stable earnings cycles in Europe and Japan, bolstered by industrial rebounds and healthcare demand, amid interest rate cuts fostering sector rotation. Emerging markets gain from commodity uptrends, tech supply chain shifts, and higher GDP forecasts outpacing advanced economies, though geopolitical tensions and tariff risks loom. Capital inflows rise as investors seek value—international stocks trade at ~35% P/E discounts to U.S. peers—while regulatory pushes for supply chain diversification and AI-related investments catalyze both regions. Risks include currency volatility and policy uncertainty, underscoring the appeal of broad ex-U.S. exposure in diversified portfolios.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IXUS has occasionally edged IEFA due to emerging market contributions from tech leaders like Taiwan Semiconductor, aligning with global rotations toward value and growth hybrids amid commodity strength and rate expectations. IEFA demonstrates steadier positioning, anchored in developed industrials and financials, exhibiting lower volatility during U.S. dollar peaks that pressure EM assets. Over broader periods, both reflect international outperformance versus U.S. benchmarks, with IXUS's ~25% EM allocation amplifying upside in risk-on phases but heightening drawdowns amid geopolitical shifts. IEFA's relative stability suits defensive tilts, while IXUS enhances diversification through broader geographic and sector momentum.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and scalping, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, adapting dynamically to volatility, trends, and sector shifts. Investors can explore bots tailored to ETFs like IEFA and IXUS, gaining insights into algorithmic edges. Visit the page to discover leading bots and consider integrating AI signals into your ETF comparison and positioning strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IXUS for its superior diversification profile, encompassing emerging markets that have shown structural momentum in recent cycles, alongside comparable cost efficiency and trend consistency. While IEFA excels in liquidity and developed-market stability, IXUS's broader exposure—bolstered by tech-heavy EM holdings—positions it probabilistically stronger amid favorable macro tailwinds like dollar weakness and global growth divergence, assuming moderate risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IEFA vs. IXUS commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IEFA is a Hold and IXUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 182B vs. IXUS (56.9B). IXUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: IXUS (11.271) vs IEFA (7.501). IEFA was incepted earlier than IXUS: IEFA (14 years) vs IXUS (14 years). IEFA (0.07) and IXUS (0.07) have comparable expense ratios . IEFA (3.00) and IXUS (3.00) have matching turnover.
IEFAIXUSIEFA / IXUS
Gain YTD7.50111.27167%
Net Assets182B56.9B320%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.07100%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield3.242.83114%
Fund Existence14 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEFAIXUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEFA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IXUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFA96.820.76
+0.80%
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
INDA47.540.33
+0.70%
iShares MSCI India ETF
RNWZ31.38N/A
N/A
TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF
AGZD22.65-0.03
-0.13%
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF
QQA56.00-0.63
-1.11%
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF

IEFA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEFA
1D Price
Change %
IEFA100%
+0.01%
ASML - IEFA
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
SAP - IEFA
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
SHEL - IEFA
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
ROG - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
MC - IEFA
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
More

IXUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXUS has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IXUS jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXUS
1D Price
Change %
IXUS100%
+0.01%
ASML - IXUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
MC - IXUS
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
AZN - IXUS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%