Investors navigating the technology sector face choices between broad market exposure and targeted thematic strategies. The iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) both deliver U.S. tech equity access but diverge in approach: IETC's active management prioritizes resilient domestic value chains, while IYW passively mirrors a capped technology index. Amid AI-driven growth, supply chain realignments, and semiconductor innovation, comparing these ETFs highlights trade-offs in cost, concentration, and positioning for sector rotation.
IETC is an actively managed ETF seeking long-term growth through U.S. technology companies with resilient value chains and heightened domestic capabilities in production, revenues, and technology. It employs a proprietary classification system and alternative data to select holdings, bypassing traditional indexing for a focus on tech independence themes like those bolstered by the CHIPS and Science Act.
The fund holds 87 stocks, with top holdings including PLTR (11.57%), AVGO (11.51%), NVDA (7.87%), Microsoft (MSFT) (5.08%), and Oracle (ORCL) (4.65%). Sector allocations emphasize Software & Services (39.26%) and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (26.95%), followed by Tech Hardware & Equipment (10.90%).
With an expense ratio (ER, annual fee as a percentage of assets) of 0.18%, IETC offers cost efficiency. Launched in 2018, it exhibits moderate liquidity and quarterly rebalancing aligned with its active strategy.
IYW is a passive ETF tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which includes U.S. equities in the technology sector with caps to limit concentration risk. It provides broad exposure to electronics, software, hardware, and IT services firms.
Comprising 139 holdings, top positions feature NVDA (17.05%), AAPL (15.32%), Alphabet Class A (GOOGL) (7.04%), Alphabet Class C (GOOG) (5.72%), and MSFT (4.35%). Key sectors include Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (38.22%), Software & Services (22.85%), Tech Hardware & Equipment (20.84%), and Media & Entertainment (16.23%).
The 0.38% ER reflects standard passive management costs. Inception in 2000 underscores its established track record, with high liquidity from substantial average daily volume and tight bid-ask spreads.
The U.S. technology sector thrives on AI proliferation, semiconductor advancements, and cloud computing expansion. Macro drivers include sustained capital flows into AI infrastructure, geopolitical efforts to onshore supply chains via policies like the CHIPS Act, and interest rate dynamics favoring growth stocks. Risks encompass valuation stretches, regulatory scrutiny on big tech, and trade tensions disrupting global semis production. Capital rotates toward resilient domestic leaders amid these shifts, benefiting thematic funds while broad indices capture mega-cap momentum.
In recent months, both ETFs have advanced with technology sector tailwinds from AI adoption and earnings strength in semiconductors and software. IYW's heavier mega-cap tilt, particularly NVDA and AAPL, has amplified gains during risk-on periods but introduced higher beta (1.26 vs. IETC's 1.17). IETC's active selections in supply chain-resilient names like PLTR and AVGO have provided relative stability amid volatility spikes from geopolitical events. Over broader cycles, IYW's diversification edges out in liquidity-driven rallies, while IETC shines in rotations toward domestic tech themes. Volatility profiles align closely around 18% standard deviation.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-generated signals. Customizable filters span industries, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. This efficiency uncovers trade ideas, trending opportunities, and breakout candidates faster than manual methods. Explore it today to refine your ETF comparison and strategy.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYW for its superior liquidity, broader diversification across 139 holdings, and alignment with mega-cap tech momentum driving recent sector cycles. While IETC's lower expense ratio and active independence focus offer appeal in supply chain risk scenarios, IYW's scale and passive efficiency position it probabilistically stronger for sustained tech exposure (60-70% preference based on trend consistency and risk-adjusted metrics).
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IETC | IYW | IETC / IYW | |
| Gain YTD | 7.848 | 27.072 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 782M | 25.4B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.38 | 47% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 7.00 | 614% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.11 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| IETC | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IETC has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IETC jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IETC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IETC | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| AVGO - IETC | 74% Closely correlated | +4.70% | ||
| PLTR - IETC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| NVDA - IETC | 68% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| ORCL - IETC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CRWD - IETC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||