IFED
Price
$51.35
Change
+$2.15 (+4.37%)
Updated
Aug 18, 12:38 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
73.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IWML
Price
$34.49
Change
+$0.17 (+0.50%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Net Assets
18.37M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFED vs IWML

IFED vs IWML Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 31, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) vs. ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML)

Key Takeaways

  • IFED provides unlevered exposure to a rules-based large-cap U.S. equity strategy designed to align with Federal Reserve policy signals, while IWML delivers 2x leveraged exposure to the Russell 2000 Total Return Index, emphasizing small-cap size factor performance.
  • Both products are exchange-traded notes (ETNs) issued by UBS, introducing counterparty credit risk absent in traditional exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that hold underlying securities.
  • IFED targets a broad large-cap universe with dynamic factor tilts, whereas IWML applies daily compounded 2x leverage with quarterly resets, resulting in higher volatility and potential compounding effects over time.
  • Expense structures differ notably: IWML carries a 0.95% annual tracking fee plus financing costs tied to short-term interest rates, while IFED’s fee profile reflects its unlevered index-tracking approach.
  • Sector and market-cap exposure diverge significantly, with IFED focused on large-cap names and IWML concentrated on small-cap equities, influencing sensitivity to interest-rate cycles and economic growth phases.
  • Structural differences in leverage and index methodology create distinct risk-return profiles, making the pair suitable for investors seeking complementary or alternative factor exposures rather than direct substitutes.

Introduction

IFED and IWML represent two distinct approaches within the U.S. equity factor space. IFED seeks to capture large-cap opportunities aligned with Federal Reserve policy dynamics, while IWML applies leveraged exposure to small-cap size characteristics. These ETNs do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies that may appeal to investors targeting different segments of the market-capitalization spectrum and varying degrees of leverage. Comparing their structures helps clarify how each fits within broader portfolio construction amid shifting macroeconomic conditions.

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) Overview

IFED tracks the Nasdaq IFED US Large-Cap Index, a composite designed to maximize exposure to large-cap U.S. equities positioned to benefit from prevailing Federal Reserve monetary policy. The product is structured as an unlevered ETN with a focus on dynamic factor selection rather than static sector or style mandates. Holdings reflect a rules-based methodology that adjusts based on economic signals, typically resulting in a diversified large-cap portfolio. The strategy is passive in execution yet incorporates policy-responsive tilts. As an ETN, it carries UBS counterparty risk. Expense ratios for similar ETRACS products in the lineup generally align with competitive unlevered factor vehicles, though exact figures should be confirmed via the prospectus.

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) Overview

IWML provides 2x leveraged long exposure to the compounded quarterly performance of the Russell 2000 Total Return Index before fees and financing costs. The ETN resets leverage quarterly and includes an annual tracking fee of 0.95% plus accrued financing fees linked to short-term rates such as three-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR plus a spread. It targets small-cap U.S. equities through a market-cap-weighted size-factor approach. The leveraged structure amplifies both gains and losses, with permanent deleveraging possible under certain market conditions. As an ETN, investors face issuer credit risk in addition to market and leverage risks. Top holdings mirror the underlying Russell 2000 constituents, emphasizing smaller companies across sectors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both products operate within the U.S. equity factor and leveraged-products ecosystem. Large-cap policy-sensitive strategies like IFED respond to interest-rate expectations and monetary-policy shifts, while small-cap leveraged vehicles like IWML exhibit heightened sensitivity to economic growth, credit conditions, and risk appetite. Recent market cycles have featured rotation between growth and value styles alongside volatility in small-cap segments driven by inflation trends and Federal Reserve actions. Regulatory oversight of ETNs remains focused on disclosure of leverage mechanics and counterparty exposure. Capital flows into factor and leveraged products continue to reflect investor demand for targeted beta and enhanced return potential amid evolving macroeconomic drivers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IFED’s unlevered large-cap orientation has provided relatively stable exposure aligned with broader equity trends and policy developments. IWML’s 2x leverage on small-cap names has amplified movements tied to economic expansion or contraction phases, resulting in greater volatility. Performance differentials arise from market-cap focus, with large-cap holdings in IFED often demonstrating resilience during defensive periods and small-cap constituents in IWML showing outsized responses to risk-on sentiment. Relative positioning highlights IFED’s emphasis on diversification within large caps versus IWML’s concentrated small-cap beta, influencing behavior across interest-rate and growth environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into products like IFED and IWML may find the platform useful for refining screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to IFED due to its unlevered profile, lower inherent volatility from the absence of daily compounding leverage, and alignment with large-cap stability within a policy-responsive framework. IWML’s 2x leverage introduces amplified risk and financing costs that may outweigh benefits in uncertain rate environments, though it could suit investors with higher risk tolerance seeking small-cap magnification. This assessment rests on diversification, cost efficiency, and trend consistency considerations rather than short-term signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IFED vs. IWML commentary
Aug 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFED is a Buy and IWML is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFED has more net assets: 73.1M vs. IWML (18.4M). IWML has a higher annual dividend yield than IFED: IWML (44.882) vs IFED (6.143). IFED was incepted earlier than IWML: IFED (5 years) vs IWML (6 years).
IFEDIWMLIFED / IWML
Gain YTD6.14344.88214%
Net Assets73.1M18.4M397%
Total Expense RatioN/AN/A-
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence5 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFEDIWML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IWML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLX2.290.07
+3.15%
Protalix BioTherapeutics
AZZ153.241.89
+1.25%
AZZ
MTEX6.310.06
+0.96%
Mannatech
VTR91.17-0.35
-0.38%
Ventas
HAFC32.20-0.24
-0.74%
Hanmi Financial Corp