Ad is loading...
IFS
Price
$28.98
Change
+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
87 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$26.74
Change
+$0.48 (+1.83%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
56 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IFS vs RF

Header iconIFS vs RF Comparison
Open Charts IFS vs RFBanner chart's image
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$28.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Volume$133.08K
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$26.74
Change+$0.48 (+1.83%)
Volume$6.85M
CapitalizationN/A
IFS vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFS vs. RF commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFS is a StrongBuy and RF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (IFS: $28.98 vs. RF: $26.74)
Brand notoriety: IFS: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFS: 84% vs. RF: 88%
Market capitalization -- IFS: $2.77B vs. RF: $18.9B
IFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.77B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IFS and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IFS and RF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). IFS (9.76) and RF (9.74) have similar P/E ratio . RF YTD gains are higher at: 43.067 vs. IFS (38.177). RF has less debt than IFS: RF (2.33B) vs IFS (10.4B). RF has higher revenues than IFS: RF (7.57B) vs IFS (6.82B).
IFSRFIFS / RF
Capitalization2.77B18.9B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.17743.06789%
P/E Ratio9.769.74100%
Revenue6.82B7.57B90%
Total CashN/A1.55B-
Total Debt10.4B2.33B446%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFS vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
IFS
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2281
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
407
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (82) in the Major Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFS (100) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (40) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (19) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFSRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCRT2.320.19
+8.92%
Alaunos Therapeutics Inc.
GIFI7.100.18
+2.60%
Gulf Island Fabrication
IIIN30.110.34
+1.14%
Insteel Industries
THC147.92-3.92
-2.58%
Tenet Healthcare Corp
ZETA21.72-1.39
-6.01%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
+0.14%
BAP - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
SBNY - IFS
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
MCB - IFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
RRBI - IFS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
RF - IFS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+1.83%
HBAN - RF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
CFG - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
ZION - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
ASB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
FITB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More