IGPT
Price
$90.89
Change
-$9.64 (-9.59%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
1.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$569.69
Change
-$57.84 (-9.22%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
65.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IGPT vs SMH

Header iconIGPT vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IGPT vs SMHBanner chart's image
IGPT vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • IGPT offers broader exposure to AI-driven software development with 101 holdings across semiconductors (50%), interactive media (14%), and software (10%), while SMH provides concentrated pure-play semiconductor access via 26 holdings, 100% in information technology.
  • SMH features a lower expense ratio of 0.35% compared to IGPT's 0.56%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both ETFs exhibit significant overlap in top holdings like NVDA, AMD, MU, and INTC, but IGPT diversifies into media and healthcare equipment.
  • IGPT rebalances quarterly on a fixed schedule, promoting methodological consistency; SMH's index emphasizes liquidity and market-cap weighting for the top 25 U.S.-listed semiconductor firms.
  • SMH demonstrates superior liquidity with massive AUM (over $65 billion) and high trading volume, suiting large investors, while IGPT ($1 billion AUM) appeals to thematic AI seekers.
  • Structural differences position SMH for semiconductor cycle upside and IGPT for balanced AI ecosystem growth amid sector rotation.

Introduction

In the accelerating AI landscape, Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) offer compelling yet distinct pathways to technology-driven returns. IGPT targets companies advancing next-generation software development, blending semiconductors with software and media exposure. SMH, conversely, delivers focused access to the semiconductor value chain, powering AI infrastructure. These ETFs do not compete directly but provide alternative strategies for investors eyeing AI growth: IGPT for diversified thematic exposure and SMH for concentrated industry leadership. With surging demand for AI chips and software, comparing their structures reveals optimal positioning in sector rotation and capital flows.

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) Overview

The Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) is a passive ETF that tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, focusing on companies deriving significant revenue from technologies enabling future software development, including AI, automation, and robotics. It holds approximately 101 stocks, providing moderate diversification.

Top holdings include Micron Technology (MU, ~10%), SK hynix (~10%), Intel (INTC, ~8%), Alphabet (GOOGL, ~7%), and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD, ~7%). Sector allocations emphasize Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (50%), Interactive Media & Services (14%), Software (10%), and Technology Hardware (9%). The expense ratio is 0.56%.

IGPT rebalances quarterly after the close on the second Friday of March, June, September, and December. With around $1 billion in assets, it offers solid liquidity via daily trading volume near 95,000 shares, distinguishing itself through global AI software ecosystem exposure.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive fund replicating the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, targeting the performance of companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. Limited to 26 highly liquid, large-cap holdings, it prioritizes U.S.-listed firms, including foreign ADRs (American Depositary Receipts), for pure sector focus.

Top holdings typically feature NVIDIA (NVDA, ~18%), Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM, ~11%), Broadcom (AVGO, ~8%), Intel (INTC, ~7%), and AMD (AMD, ~6%), with the top 10 comprising over 70% of assets. Sector allocation is 100% Information Technology (semiconductors).

The expense ratio stands at 0.35%. The index methodology favors market-cap and liquidity, with periodic reviews ensuring alignment. Boasting over $65 billion in assets under management (AUM) and millions in daily volume, SMH excels in liquidity, ideal for institutional-scale positioning in the semiconductor supply chain.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The AI revolution propels semiconductors and software into a high-growth trajectory, with global chip sales projected to exceed $1 trillion in 2026, driven by generative AI infrastructure. Hyperscalers' capital expenditures, nearing $500 billion annually, fuel demand for accelerators, memory, and networking amid data center expansions.

Macro catalysts include AI chip revenues approaching $500 billion, memory price inflation (memflation), and agentic AI requiring vast compute. Regulatory scrutiny on exports and supply chains adds risks, alongside geopolitical tensions affecting Taiwan-based production. Capital flows favor semiconductors, with sector momentum from earnings cycles at leaders like NVDA and TSM. Broader risks encompass cyclical downturns and competition in custom silicon, yet AI tailwinds sustain multi-year expansion.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMH has demonstrated stronger relative positioning, benefiting from semiconductor momentum tied to AI accelerator demand and robust earnings from top holdings. Over broader periods like the past year, SMH's returns have outpaced IGPT by leveraging concentration in high-growth chipmakers amid sector rotation toward hardware.

IGPT, with its software and media diversification, exhibits lower volatility but tempered upside during hardware-led rallies influenced by interest rate expectations and hyperscaler spending. Both capture AI trends, yet SMH's purity amplifies gains in bull phases, while IGPT offers resilience via balanced exposure. Volatility differences stem from SMH's top-heavy structure versus IGPT's broader holdings, aligning with macro shifts like commodity trends in memory and geopolitical supply dynamics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to uncover ETF insights like those for IGPT and SMH.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH with higher probability due to its cost efficiency (0.35% expense ratio), superior liquidity, concentrated exposure to surging semiconductor momentum, and trend consistency in AI infrastructure cycles. While IGPT's diversification strengthens its profile amid software rotations, SMH's structural alignment with capital flows and lower risk-adjusted costs positions it ahead observationally.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IGPT vs. SMH commentary
Jun 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGPT is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 65.1B vs. IGPT (1.12B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IGPT: SMH (58.190) vs IGPT (52.833). IGPT was incepted earlier than SMH: IGPT (21 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IGPT (0.56). IGPT has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
IGPTSMHIGPT / SMH
Gain YTD52.83358.19091%
Net Assets1.12B65.1B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.560.35160%
Turnover18.0012.00150%
Yield0.030.1814%
Fund Existence21 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGPTSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IGPT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VYMRX14.83N/A
N/A
Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap C
MPSIX24.26-0.47
-1.90%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index Inst
FCIUX18.26-0.38
-2.04%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl I
AEPGX64.80-2.82
-4.17%
American Funds EUPAC A
FOCSX22.09-1.01
-4.37%
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6

IGPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGPT has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGPT jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGPT
1D Price
Change %
IGPT100%
-9.59%
MU - IGPT
79%
Closely correlated
-13.25%
AMD - IGPT
70%
Closely correlated
-10.86%
WDC - IGPT
63%
Loosely correlated
-11.06%
NVDA - IGPT
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.20%
ARM - IGPT
60%
Loosely correlated
-12.84%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-9.22%
LRCX - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AMAT - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
-9.71%
KLAC - SMH
82%
Closely correlated
-9.47%
TSM - SMH
80%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
ASML - SMH
79%
Closely correlated
-6.59%
More