IGV
Price
$87.32
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
13.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IYW
Price
$243.37
Change
-$9.91 (-3.91%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
25.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IGV vs IYW

IGV vs IYW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) vs. iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW)

Key Takeaways

  • IGV offers targeted exposure to North American software companies with 111 holdings, while IYW provides broader U.S. technology sector coverage across 139 holdings, including semiconductors and hardware.
  • Both ETFs maintain low expense ratios—IGV at 0.39% and IYW at 0.38%—ensuring cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • IGV's top holdings like ORCL (9.65%), MSFT (8.24%), and PLTR (7.30%) emphasize application and systems software, contrasting IYW's concentration in NVDA and AAPL.
  • IGV exhibits higher sector-specific risk due to its narrow software focus, while IYW's diversification across technology subsectors offers relatively lower volatility.
  • Recent market cycles highlight IYW's relative strength, driven by semiconductor momentum, compared to software sector headwinds in IGV.
  • Both funds demonstrate strong liquidity, with high average daily volumes supporting efficient trading.

Introduction

In the evolving technology landscape, investors often weigh specialized sector exposure against broader diversification. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) represent complementary yet distinct strategies within the technology domain. IGV targets North American software firms, capitalizing on cloud computing and enterprise solutions, while IYW encompasses the full U.S. technology spectrum, including semiconductors and hardware. These ETFs compete indirectly, offering alternatives for those seeking pure software plays versus comprehensive tech sector positioning. Amid AI-driven innovation and shifting capital flows, comparing their structural differences, exposure profiles, and performance dynamics aids informed allocation decisions in today's market environment.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) seeks to track the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark of U.S.- and Canadian-listed software companies, plus select interactive media and home entertainment firms. Launched in 2001, this passive ETF holds 111 stocks, with individual weights capped at 8.5% to enhance diversification within a concentrated industry. Top holdings include ORCL (9.65%), MSFT (8.24%), PLTR (7.30%), CRM (6.33%), and PANW (6.25%). Sector allocations heavily favor application software (58%) and systems software (38%), reflecting its thematic focus on software innovation.

IGV's expense ratio stands at 0.39%, with assets under management (AUM, total value of fund assets) exceeding $13 billion. The index undergoes semiannual reviews in June and December, with quarterly weight capping. High average daily volume underscores its liquidity, making it suitable for sector rotation strategies.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, providing exposure to large- and mid-cap U.S. technology equities covering the sector's top 95% of market capitalization. Established in 2000, this passive fund features 139 holdings, with caps limiting single stocks at 22.5% and issuers at 45% to mitigate concentration risk. Key positions include NVDA (16%), AAPL (13.5%), GOOGL (7.5%), MSFT, and semiconductors like AVGO.

Sector breakdown emphasizes semiconductors, software & services, and tech hardware. IYW's expense ratio is 0.38%, with AUM around $23 billion. The index reconstitutes annually with quarterly reviews, supporting balanced exposure. Robust trading volume confirms excellent liquidity for institutional and retail investors alike.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector remains a cornerstone of equity markets, propelled by artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing expansion, and semiconductor demand. AI infrastructure buildouts, including data centers and custom chips, favor hardware and chipmakers, while software faces disruption risks from AI automation. Capital flows have shifted toward semiconductors amid surging AI spending by hyperscalers like Microsoft and Amazon. Regulatory scrutiny on antitrust and data privacy persists, alongside macroeconomic drivers such as interest rates impacting growth valuations. Sector risks include supply chain vulnerabilities and valuation stretches, yet long-term tailwinds from digital transformation sustain appeal across software and broad technology exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, IYW has outperformed IGV, reflecting semiconductor strength amid AI hardware demand versus software sector pressures. Over the past three months, IYW delivered approximately 20% returns compared to IGV's 10%, with year-to-date figures showing IYW up 16% against IGV's decline of 14%. This divergence ties to sector rotation favoring chips (NVDA, Broadcom) over traditional software, influenced by AI capex cycles and earnings from top holdings. Volatility metrics reveal IGV's three-year standard deviation at 23.73% (beta 1.11), slightly higher than IYW's 21.12% (beta 1.36), underscoring software's niche sensitivity. Relative positioning favors IYW in momentum-driven environments, while IGV suits software recovery bets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total market value of a company's shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in technology ETFs and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYW due to its broader diversification, slightly lower expense ratio, stronger trend consistency in recent market cycles, and alignment with semiconductor momentum. While IGV's software purity offers appeal in cloud recovery scenarios, IYW's risk-adjusted positioning and sector balance yield a 60-70% probabilistic edge in the prevailing AI infrastructure environment. This assessment reflects observable structural and momentum factors, not personalized advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IGV vs. IYW commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IGV is a Hold and IYW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 25.6B vs. IGV (13.4B). IYW has a higher annual dividend yield than IGV: IYW (21.961) vs IGV (-17.366). IGV was incepted earlier than IYW: IGV (25 years) vs IYW (26 years). IYW (0.38) and IGV (0.39) have comparable expense ratios . IGV has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IGVIYWIGV / IYW
Gain YTD-17.36621.961-79%
Net Assets13.4B25.6B52%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.38103%
Turnover20.007.00286%
Yield0.000.11-
Fund Existence25 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IGVIYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUBD22.070.04
+0.18%
Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF
CBTO19.70-0.01
-0.05%
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-Oct
BDIV24.29-0.11
-0.44%
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
FLAU33.99-0.65
-1.87%
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
AAXJ116.72-7.49
-6.03%
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Jpn ETF

IGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGV
1D Price
Change %
IGV100%
+0.01%
CRM - IGV
75%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
CRWD - IGV
75%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
MSFT - IGV
72%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
ASAN - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
DSGX - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
More

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
-3.91%
NVDA - IYW
76%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
LRCX - IYW
71%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
AVGO - IYW
68%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
AMD - IYW
68%
Closely correlated
-5.76%
MU - IYW
67%
Closely correlated
-13.18%
More