IGV and IYW both deliver targeted technology exposure yet pursue different strategies within the sector. Investors often compare them when seeking efficient ways to gain equity exposure to innovation-driven companies. IGV narrows its focus to software and select interactive media firms, while IYW encompasses a wider array of technology sub-industries. The comparison helps clarify trade-offs between specialized software concentration and diversified technology sector participation in the current market environment.
IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, providing exposure to North American equities primarily in the software industry along with select interactive media and services companies. The fund holds approximately 106 to 112 securities and maintains a passive, market-capitalization-weighted structure. Sector allocations are overwhelmingly concentrated in technology, with application software representing roughly 52% and systems software about 43% of assets. The expense ratio stands at 0.38%. Rebalancing occurs periodically in line with index methodology to reflect changes in constituent weights. Distinguishing features include its thematic emphasis on software, resulting in higher concentration among large-cap software leaders compared with broader technology benchmarks.
IYW tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, offering exposure to U.S. equities across the technology sector. The fund holds approximately 149 to 151 securities and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach with capping constraints. Sector allocations include significant weights in semiconductors and semiconductor equipment (around 38%), software and services (approximately 26%), technology hardware and equipment (about 18%), and media and entertainment (near 14%). The expense ratio is 0.38%. Rebalancing aligns with the underlying index rules. Key characteristics include broader subsector diversification within technology relative to software-only strategies, along with exposure to hardware and semiconductor cycles.
The technology sector continues to be shaped by advances in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor demand. Capital flows into technology equities have remained robust amid ongoing digital transformation trends. Regulatory developments around data privacy, antitrust scrutiny of large technology platforms, and export controls on advanced chips represent ongoing considerations. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence both software spending and hardware investment. Sector risks include valuation compression during periods of higher rates and potential slowdowns in enterprise technology budgets.
Over recent market cycles, IGV has shown greater sensitivity to software earnings announcements and cloud spending trends due to its concentrated holdings. IYW has reflected a broader mix of semiconductor demand cycles and hardware supply dynamics alongside software performance. Both ETFs have participated in technology sector rotations driven by earnings growth and macroeconomic shifts, with IYW generally exhibiting slightly lower volatility from its wider subsector diversification. Relative positioning favors IGV for investors targeting pure software exposure and IYW for those seeking balanced technology participation across hardware and semiconductor areas.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to IYW. The broader subsector exposure across semiconductors, hardware, and software provides a more balanced risk profile relative to IGV’s concentrated software focus, while maintaining equivalent expense ratios and strong liquidity characteristics.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IGV | IYW | IGV / IYW | |
| Gain YTD | -3.048 | 22.331 | -14% |
| Net Assets | 14.3B | 24.9B | 57% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.38 | 103% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 15.00 | 133% |
| Yield | 0.02 | 0.11 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| IGV | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| CRM - IGV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ASAN - IGV | 70% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| ESTC - IGV | 70% Closely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| DSGX - IGV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| ZETA - IGV | 69% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| NVDA - IYW | 74% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| ONTO - IYW | 67% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| AMKR - IYW | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.70% | ||
| MKSI - IYW | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| COHR - IYW | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
More | ||||