IHI
Price
$49.62
Change
+$0.50 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PINK
Price
$38.09
Change
+$0.44 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
343.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IHI vs PINK

IHI vs PINK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) vs. Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK)

Key Takeaways

  • IHI is a passive ETF tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, offering concentrated exposure to 47 medical device companies, while PINK is an actively managed fund targeting 50-100 innovative health care firms across biotech, medtech, and related areas.
  • IHI features top holdings like ISRG (16.53%), ABT (16.06%), and SYK (11.04%), with 100% sector allocation to health care equipment; PINK's leaders include UTHR (8.14%), PCT (6.71%), and ALGN (5.87%), with ~93% in health care.
  • Expense ratios differ at 0.38% for IHI (lower cost) versus 0.51% for PINK, reflecting passive versus active management.
  • IHI provides higher liquidity with average daily volume over 2 million shares; PINK offers a unique pro bono structure, donating net profits to Susan G. Komen.
  • Both ETFs target health care growth but IHI emphasizes established device makers for stability, while PINK seeks higher-growth innovators with broader diversification.
  • Risk profiles vary: IHI's concentration in top holdings (75% in top 10) may amplify sector-specific volatility; PINK's active approach allows tactical adjustments amid biotech trends.

Introduction

In the evolving health care landscape, investors seek targeted exposure to medical innovation amid aging populations, technological advances, and rising demand for treatments. The IHI and PINK ETFs represent complementary yet distinct strategies within this sector. IHI delivers precise, passive access to U.S. medical device leaders, capitalizing on procedural growth and diagnostics. PINK, actively managed, pursues broader health care innovators including biotech and gene therapy, aiming for outsized returns through stock selection. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in focus, costs, and risk, aiding decisions on sector rotation or portfolio diversification in recent market cycles.

iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) Overview

The iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) is a passive fund seeking to track the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, composed of U.S. equities in the medical devices subsector. Launched in 2006, it holds 47 stocks, with top holdings including ISRG (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., 16.53%), ABT (Abbott Laboratories, 16.06%), SYK (Stryker Corporation, 11.04%), EW (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, 4.98%), and IDXX (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., 4.74%). The top 10 account for about 75% of assets.

Sector allocation is 100% health care, focused on equipment and supplies. The expense ratio is 0.38%, with assets under management (AUM, a measure of fund size) around $3 billion. High liquidity is evident in average daily volume exceeding 2 million shares and a tight 0.02% median bid-ask spread. The index rebalances periodically to reflect market-cap weighting, ensuring structural purity in medical device exposure without active bets.

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) Overview

The Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) is an actively managed fund pursuing long-term capital appreciation through exposure to 50-100 U.S. health care companies, emphasizing biotech, medtech, gene therapy, and cost-reducing innovators per Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) definitions. Launched in 2021, it holds approximately 52 stocks, with top positions like UTHR (United Therapeutics Corporation, 8.14%), PCT (PureCycle Technologies, Inc., 6.71%), ALGN (Align Technology, Inc., 5.87%), NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S, 5.75%), and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson, 5.55%). The top 10 comprise 52.69% of assets.

Sector breakdown is predominantly health care (92.73%), with minor industrials (7.27%). The expense ratio stands at 0.51%, reflecting active management, with AUM near $250 million. Liquidity includes a 0.20% median bid-ask spread and daily volume around 25,000 shares. A distinguishing feature is its pro bono model: net profits are donated to Susan G. Komen, with over $350,000 contributed to date. No fixed index or rebalancing schedule; portfolio adjusts via manager discretion.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The health care sector benefits from structural tailwinds like demographic aging, chronic disease prevalence, and technological leaps in robotics, diagnostics, and therapies. Medical devices (IHI's focus) thrive on elective procedures rebounding post-pandemic and minimally invasive innovations, though facing reimbursement pressures and supply chain risks. Broader health care (PINK's domain) rides biotech funding cycles, GLP-1 drug momentum, and gene editing advances, tempered by regulatory hurdles from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and patent cliffs.

Recent capital flows favor defensive growth amid macro uncertainty, with interest rate expectations influencing valuations. Sector risks include policy shifts like drug pricing reforms and geopolitical tensions affecting semiconductors for devices. Both ETFs position for innovation-driven cycles, but devices offer stability while biotech adds volatility tied to clinical outcomes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, IHI has shown resilience tied to steady device demand from leaders like ISRG and ABT, benefiting from sector rotation toward quality growth amid earnings beats in procedures. Its lower beta (around 0.90) reflects moderated volatility compared to broader health care.

PINK, with active tilts toward high-conviction names like UTHR and NVO, has navigated biotech swings via tactical shifts, potentially capturing upside from drug approvals but exposing to higher drawdowns. Relative to IHI, PINK exhibits greater dispersion linked to innovation momentum and rate-sensitive small-caps. Both lag mega-cap tech in rallies but outperform cyclicals, with IHI's concentration amplifying device-specific trends versus PINK's diversified bets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like health care ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IHI with moderate conviction (60-70% probability of relative outperformance over 3-6 months). This stems from its cost efficiency (0.38% expense ratio), superior liquidity, established track record, and concentrated exposure to stable medical device leaders amid consistent sector momentum. PINK's active strategy and innovation tilt offer upside potential but carry higher costs, turnover (201%), and volatility from biotech bets, better suited for risk-tolerant allocations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IHI vs. PINK commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IHI is a Buy and PINK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHI has more net assets: 3B vs. PINK (343M). PINK has a higher annual dividend yield than IHI: PINK (4.228) vs IHI (-19.978). IHI was incepted earlier than PINK: IHI (20 years) vs PINK (5 years). IHI (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than PINK (0.51). PINK has a higher turnover IHI (16.00) vs IHI (16.00).
IHIPINKIHI / PINK
Gain YTD-19.9784.228-473%
Net Assets3B343M874%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.5175%
Turnover16.00201.008%
Yield0.450.6669%
Fund Existence20 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIR.X0.003477-0.000077
-2.16%
Mirror Protocol cryptocurrency
ORDI.X3.108142-0.082503
-2.59%
ORDI cryptocurrency
WRX.X0.019467-0.000552
-2.76%
WazirX cryptocurrency
SKL.X0.003654-0.000185
-4.83%
SKALE cryptocurrency
PEPE.X0.000003N/A
-5.92%
Pepe cryptocurrency

IHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHI has been closely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHI jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHI
1D Price
Change %
IHI100%
+1.02%
SYK - IHI
73%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
ISRG - IHI
72%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
MDT - IHI
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
ABT - IHI
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
STE - IHI
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
More

PINK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINK has been loosely correlated with MDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINK jumps, then MDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PINK
1D Price
Change %
PINK100%
+1.17%
MDT - PINK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
REGN - PINK
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
RVTY - PINK
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.74%
ZTS - PINK
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
PEN - PINK
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
More