ING
Price
$33.77
Change
-$1.12 (-3.21%)
Updated
Oct 7, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
103.29B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUFG
Price
$22.50
Change
-$0.70 (-3.02%)
Updated
Oct 7, 11:07 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
265.96B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs MUFG

ING vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. MUFG commentary
Oct 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a StrongBuy and MUFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
ING
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2134
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (84) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (3) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MUFG (34) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2026
Stock price -- (ING: $34.90 vs. MUFG: $23.20)
Brand notoriety: ING and MUFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 108% vs. MUFG: 63%
Market capitalization -- ING: $103.29B vs. MUFG: $265.96B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $103.29B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $265.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $1.04M to $894.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $206.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while MUFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and MUFG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNT32.840.95
+2.98%
Vontier Corp
ALNY223.944.05
+1.84%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
RBKB13.22-0.01
-0.08%
Rhinebeck Bancorp
UFG0.39-0.02
-3.80%
Uni-Fuels Holdings Ltd
JBIO13.41-0.66
-4.69%
Jade Biosciences Inc

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+0.37%
SAN - ING
74%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
HSBC - ING
73%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
BCS - ING
70%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
BBVA - ING
67%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
BMO - ING
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+1.00%
SMFG - MUFG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ING - MUFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
BCS - MUFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
TD - MUFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
SAN - MUFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More