ING
Price
$22.71
Change
-$0.65 (-2.78%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
54.32B
89 days until earnings call
RBSPF
Price
$6.93
Change
+$0.03 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
30.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs RBSPF

Header iconING vs RBSPF Comparison
Open Charts ING vs RBSPFBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$22.71
Change-$0.65 (-2.78%)
Volume$3.43M
Capitalization54.32B
NatWest Group
Price$6.93
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
Volume$23.05K
Capitalization30.53B
ING vs RBSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. RBSPF commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a Hold and RBSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $22.71 vs. RBSPF: $6.93)
Brand notoriety: ING and RBSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 151% vs. RBSPF: 191%
Market capitalization -- ING: $54.32B vs. RBSPF: $30.53B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $54.32B. RBSPF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $30.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RBSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBSPF is a better buy in the long-term than ING.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBSPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBSPF is a better buy in the short-term than ING.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.90% price change this week, while RBSPF (@Major Banks) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.41% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($54.3B) has a higher market cap than RBSPF($30.5B). RBSPF has higher P/E ratio than ING: RBSPF (10.02) vs ING (7.46). ING YTD gains are higher at: 52.426 vs. RBSPF (44.479).
INGRBSPFING / RBSPF
Capitalization54.3B30.5B178%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD52.42644.479118%
P/E Ratio7.4610.0274%
Revenue22.4BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt150BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs RBSPF: Fundamental Ratings
ING
RBSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBSPF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (70) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (7) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's SMR Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as RBSPF (4) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as RBSPF (45) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as RBSPF (30) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGRBSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VKQ9.180.15
+1.66%
Invesco Municipal Trust
PMMR25.58N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - March
FRNW16.63-0.07
-0.44%
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
GCC19.98-0.14
-0.70%
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd
DIVO42.39-0.35
-0.82%
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
-2.78%
BBVA - ING
70%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
SAN - ING
68%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
BCS - ING
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
HSBC - ING
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More

RBSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSPF and TD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSPF and TD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSPF
1D Price
Change %
RBSPF100%
+0.51%
TD - RBSPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
BCS - RBSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
ING - RBSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
NABZY - RBSPF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
INGVF - RBSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More