ING
Price
$21.13
Change
-$0.31 (-1.45%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
54.32B
68 days until earnings call
RBSPF
Price
$7.21
Change
+$0.17 (+2.42%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
30.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs RBSPF

Header iconING vs RBSPF Comparison
Open Charts ING vs RBSPFBanner chart's image
ING Groep
Price$21.13
Change-$0.31 (-1.45%)
Volume$2.68M
Capitalization54.32B
NatWest Group
Price$7.21
Change+$0.17 (+2.42%)
Volume$79.35K
Capitalization30.53B
ING vs RBSPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ING vs. RBSPF commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a StrongBuy and RBSPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ING: $21.13 vs. RBSPF: $7.20)
Brand notoriety: ING and RBSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 100% vs. RBSPF: 170%
Market capitalization -- ING: $54.32B vs. RBSPF: $30.53B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $54.32B. RBSPF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $30.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RBSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and RBSPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBSPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RBSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ING and RBSPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while RBSPF (@Major Banks) price change was +13.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.99% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($54.3B) has a higher market cap than RBSPF($30.5B). RBSPF has higher P/E ratio than ING: RBSPF (10.02) vs ING (7.46). RBSPF YTD gains are higher at: 50.104 vs. ING (41.821).
INGRBSPFING / RBSPF
Capitalization54.3B30.5B178%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.82150.10483%
P/E Ratio7.4610.0274%
Revenue22.4BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt150BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs RBSPF: Fundamental Ratings
ING
RBSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2616
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBSPF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (63) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (26) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGRBSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTAB18.680.03
+0.16%
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
FLYD11.510.02
+0.16%
MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs
AVGV62.63-0.20
-0.32%
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
DEMZ36.40-0.18
-0.49%
Democratic Large Cap Core ETF
FCOM59.38-0.39
-0.65%
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF

RBSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSPF and TD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSPF and TD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSPF
1D Price
Change %
RBSPF100%
+2.49%
TD - RBSPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
BCS - RBSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
ING - RBSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
NABZY - RBSPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
INGVF - RBSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More