ING
Price
$34.93
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
100.2B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMFG
Price
$25.88
Change
+$0.10 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
162.14B
107 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ING vs SMFG

ING vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ING Groep N.V. (ING) vs. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ING and SMFG are leading European and Japanese banking groups, respectively, offering diversified financial services with exposure to retail, corporate, and wholesale banking.
  • Both stocks have delivered strong relative performance in recent weeks, with ING trading near its 52-week high amid ongoing share buybacks and SMFG showing robust year-to-date gains supported by favorable domestic conditions.
  • ING benefits from capital return initiatives and European market positioning, while SMFG leverages a larger market capitalization and record net income achievements in its fiscal year.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on banking, with ING facing eurozone interest rate dynamics and SMFG influenced by Bank of Japan policy shifts and yen movements.
  • Market sentiment remains constructive for both amid broader financial sector resilience, though volatility tied to macroeconomic data releases has influenced short-term price behavior.
  • Relative positioning highlights trade-offs in scale, geographic focus, and capital management strategies that may appeal differently to investors seeking international diversification.

Introduction

Investors and traders comparing global financial institutions often examine banks with strong regional footprints and varying growth profiles. ING Groep N.V. (ING), a major European player, and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG), a leading Japanese financial group, provide complementary exposure to developed markets outside the United States. This comparison appeals to those evaluating relative performance, sector momentum, and risk factors within international banking amid evolving interest rate environments and economic conditions in Europe and Asia.

ING Overview and Recent Performance

ING Groep N.V. operates as a multinational banking and financial services company headquartered in the Netherlands, with significant retail and wholesale banking operations across Europe. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near its 52-week high of approximately $33.46, closing around $32.83 as of July 24, 2026, reflecting continued investor interest. Performance has been supported by an ongoing €1 billion share buyback program, with substantial completion reported in mid-July. Broader sentiment benefited from solid quarterly results earlier in the year and cost discipline, contributing to year-to-date gains exceeding 20% in several measures. Price behavior in recent weeks showed resilience despite periodic pullbacks ahead of earnings, with the stock maintaining position above key moving averages.

SMFG Overview and Recent Performance

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. serves as the holding company for one of Japan’s major banking groups, encompassing commercial banking, securities, and related financial services with a strong domestic base. Recent market activity saw the stock advance to levels near $26.18 as of July 24, 2026, following periods of strength that included a 52-week high around $26.67. Year-to-date returns have been notable, often surpassing 35%, bolstered by record net income results for the fiscal year ending March 2026 and supportive monetary policy conditions. Sentiment in recent weeks reflected steady momentum, with the shares demonstrating gains over one-month and longer periods amid favorable business environment factors, while exhibiting typical volatility associated with currency and rate expectations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across equities, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and statistical profiles, allowing users to match tools to specific objectives. Metrics such as win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles vary significantly among the offerings, providing data-driven options for algorithmic approaches. The platform emphasizes transparency in bot statistics to assist informed selection. Explore the curated selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ING operates primarily in Europe with a focus on retail and wholesale banking, while SMFG maintains a core presence in Japan alongside international activities, resulting in differing sensitivities to regional economic cycles. Growth drivers for ING include capital returns via buybacks and fee income growth, contrasting with SMFG’s emphasis on domestic lending expansion and securities operations. Recent momentum has favored both, though SMFG has posted comparatively larger percentage gains over the past year. Risk factors encompass regulatory capital requirements—such as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratios—for both, alongside geographic concentration risks. Market sentiment for ING reflects European rate stabilization, whereas SMFG benefits from Japanese policy normalization. Trade-offs center on scale, with SMFG holding a larger market capitalization, versus ING’s active shareholder return program.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning within broader sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to SMFG for continued outperformance potential in the near term. This assessment draws from stronger recent percentage gains and supportive domestic catalysts, while acknowledging ING’s capital management discipline as a stabilizing element. Outcomes remain subject to macroeconomic developments and sector-specific dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ING vs. SMFG commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ING is a Hold and SMFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ING: $34.93 vs. SMFG: $25.88)
Brand notoriety: ING and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ING: 72% vs. SMFG: 81%
Market capitalization -- ING: $100.2B vs. SMFG: $162.14B
ING [@Major Banks] is valued at $100.2B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $162.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $935.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $214.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ING’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the long-term than SMFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ING’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ING’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the short-term than SMFG.

Price Growth

ING (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.40% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.08% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFG($162B) has a higher market cap than ING($100B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than ING: SMFG (17.10) vs ING (13.19). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 33.885 vs. ING (29.455). ING has less debt than SMFG: ING (185B) vs SMFG (32.55T). SMFG has higher revenues than ING: SMFG (5.79T) vs ING (23.6B).
INGSMFGING / SMFG
Capitalization100B162B62%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.45533.88587%
P/E Ratio13.1917.1077%
Revenue23.6B5.79T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt185B32.55T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ING vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
ING
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2621
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (44) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFG (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (26) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INGSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PROF7.380.13
+1.79%
Profound Medical Corp
UBER70.36-0.01
-0.01%
Uber Technologies
CCEC22.28-0.11
-0.49%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
ERAS18.15-0.53
-2.84%
Erasca
ACCS6.59-0.20
-2.95%
ACCESS Newswire Inc

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
-0.03%
SAN - ING
74%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
HSBC - ING
71%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
BCS - ING
70%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
BBVA - ING
67%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
UBS - ING
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More