It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ING’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ING’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
ING (@Major Banks) experienced а -6.30% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.31%.
ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
UBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
ING | UBS | ING / UBS | |
Capitalization | 54.3B | 98.7B | 55% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 24.738 | 1.835 | 1,348% |
P/E Ratio | 7.46 | 3.61 | 207% |
Revenue | 22.4B | 39.4B | 57% |
Total Cash | N/A | 144B | - |
Total Debt | 150B | 378B | 40% |
ING | UBS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ING's Valuation (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (81) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ING (18) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.
ING's SMR Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
ING's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as UBS (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ING (64) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ING’s over the last 12 months.
ING | UBS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago70% | 8 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 4 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago58% |