Advertisement
INRO vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRO is a StrongBuy and KLAC is a StrongBuy.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| INRO | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GRX | 9.51 | 0.03 | +0.26% |
| Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (The) | |||
| NANR | 62.07 | 0.14 | +0.23% |
| SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF | |||
| MUSE | 50.18 | N/A | N/A |
| TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF | |||
| TXS | 35.22 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
| Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF | |||
| SPTM | 78.59 | -0.16 | -0.20% |
| SPDR® Port S&P 1500 Comps Stk Mkt ETF | |||
INRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INRO has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INRO jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INRO | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| QCOM - INRO | 75% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| ENTG - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| KLAC - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| SNPS - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| LRCX - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +3.64% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 83% Closely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||