Advertisement
INRO vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRO is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| INRO | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LITP | 12.17 | 0.41 | +3.49% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | |||
| IYW | 194.59 | 1.22 | +0.63% |
| iShares US Technology ETF | |||
| TBUX | 49.93 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
| PQJA | 28.34 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY | |||
| WTMF | 37.44 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
INRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INRO has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INRO jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INRO | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| QCOM - INRO | 75% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ENTG - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| KLAC - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| SNPS - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| LRCX - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | +3.88% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +3.95% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 89% Closely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||