Advertisement
INRO vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INRO is a Buy and QCOM is a Hold.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| INRO | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QEMM | 63.96 | 0.06 | +0.10% |
| SPDR® MSCI Emerging Mkts StratcFacts ETF | |||
| RSPA | 50.51 | -0.08 | -0.16% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Eq Wght Inc Adv ETF | |||
| IWY | 260.98 | -0.68 | -0.26% |
| iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | |||
| NXP | 13.95 | -0.06 | -0.43% |
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free | |||
| CZA | 107.47 | -0.71 | -0.66% |
| Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | |||
INRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INRO has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INRO jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INRO | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| QCOM - INRO | 75% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ENTG - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| KLAC - INRO | 73% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
| SNPS - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| LRCX - INRO | 72% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
More | ||||