Advertisement
INSG vs SILC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INSG is a StrongBuy and SILC is a Hold.
| INSG | SILC | INSG / SILC | |
| Capitalization | 73.1M | 243M | 30% |
| EBITDA | 1.71M | -10.69M | -16% |
| Gain YTD | -56.475 | 187.415 | -30% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.79 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 173M | 75.4M | 229% |
| Total Cash | 1.88M | 31.3M | 6% |
| Total Debt | 53.7M | 6.44M | 834% |
INSG | SILC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSG's Valuation (1) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILC (55). This means that INSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILC’s over the last 12 months.
INSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as SILC (100). This means that INSG’s stock grew similarly to SILC’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's SMR Rating (93) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as INSG (100). This means that SILC’s stock grew similarly to INSG’s over the last 12 months.
SILC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INSG (91). This means that SILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than INSG’s over the last 12 months.
INSG's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for SILC (97). This means that INSG’s stock grew significantly faster than SILC’s over the last 12 months.
| INSG | SILC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 64% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INSG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SILC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- INSG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SILC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INSG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INSG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SILC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
INSG (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +5.42% price change this week, while SILC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
INSG is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
SILC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.26% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
Advertisement
INSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSG has been loosely correlated with ADTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INSG jumps, then ADTN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSG | 100% | +4.44% | ||
| ADTN - INSG | 46% Loosely correlated | +5.01% | ||
| VIAV - INSG | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| HLIT - INSG | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| LTRX - INSG | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| CLFD - INSG | 42% Loosely correlated | +6.15% | ||
More | ||||
SILC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILC has been loosely correlated with HLIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILC jumps, then HLIT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILC | 100% | +4.39% | ||
| HLIT - SILC | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| VIAV - SILC | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| CRNT - SILC | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| OCC - SILC | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.38% | ||
| INSG - SILC | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.44% | ||
More | ||||